1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1986.tb05624.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence From Photoreactivation Kinetics for Multiple Dna Photolyases in Yeast

Abstract: Abstract— We have analyzed the kinetics of photoreactivation of ultraviolet‐light‐irradiated cells of two strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The analysis yields plots of h(t), the number of photorepairable lethal hits remaining in the cell as a function of the time t of exposure to a continuous source of photoreactivating light. In the case of one of the strains studied, an excision‐deficient haploid strain, it is found that the time‐dependence of h(t) is given by the sum of three decreasing expone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photolyases from a variety of species have been characterized (Sabourin and Ley, 1988;Eker et al, 1986;Johnson and Haynes, 1986;Sancar et al, 1984). All known photolyases utilize two noncovalently bound cofactors as sensitizers, one of which is the dihydroflavin FADH2 (Wang and Jorns, 1989;Wang et al, 1988;Payne et al, 1987;Eker et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photolyases from a variety of species have been characterized (Sabourin and Ley, 1988;Eker et al, 1986;Johnson and Haynes, 1986;Sancar et al, 1984). All known photolyases utilize two noncovalently bound cofactors as sensitizers, one of which is the dihydroflavin FADH2 (Wang and Jorns, 1989;Wang et al, 1988;Payne et al, 1987;Eker et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complicated kinetics may result if multiple repair processes are operating independently with different rates. Such cases are discussed elsewhere (Johnson and Haynes, 1986).…”
Section: -In S(xt) = H(xt) = F(x)[lr ( X ) ] [ L -Re(xt)]mentioning
confidence: 99%