Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectivesNational dietary guidelines were introduced in 1977 and 1983, by the US and UK governments, respectively, with the ambition of reducing coronary heart disease (CHD) by reducing fat intake. To date, no analysis of the evidence base for these recommendations has been undertaken. The present study examines the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) available to the US and UK regulatory committees at their respective points of implementation.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken of RCTs, published prior to 1983, which examined the relationship between dietary fat, serum cholesterol and the development of CHD.Results2467 males participated in six dietary trials: five secondary prevention studies and one including healthy participants. There were 370 deaths from all-cause mortality in the intervention and control groups. The risk ratio (RR) from meta-analysis was 0.996 (95% CI 0.865 to 1.147). There were 207 and 216 deaths from CHD in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The RR was 0.989 (95% CI 0.784 to 1.247). There were no differences in all-cause mortality and non-significant differences in CHD mortality, resulting from the dietary interventions. The reductions in mean serum cholesterol levels were significantly higher in the intervention groups; this did not result in significant differences in CHD or all-cause mortality. Government dietary fat recommendations were untested in any trial prior to being introduced.ConclusionsDietary recommendations were introduced for 220 million US and 56 million UK citizens by 1983, in the absence of supporting evidence from RCTs.

A low-carbohydrate survey: Evidence for sustainable metabolic syndrome reversal

“…46 Although resistance within the medical community persists, 47 in recent years dietary fat has slowly been exonerated, in accordance with the best available evidence. 48,49,50,51,52,53 Studies are also now emerging to show the efficacy, sustainability and other positive effects of lowcarbohydrate diets, especially in those with metabolic disease. 54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 The definition of a low-carbohydrate diet varies in the literature, but most in the field agree that anything over 130 g -150 g per day is not low carbohydrate.…”

A systematic review of methods to assess intake of saturated fat (SF) among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity) study

“…Some studies suggest SF increases levels of beneficial high-density lipoprotein (HDL). However, whether this offsets the effect of detrimental low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and consequently the risk of CVD, is unclear [6,7]. To better understand the role of SF in the development of chronic disease there is a need for dietary assessment methods which can measure SF and its contribution to daily energy intake in a reliable and consistent way.…”

To Err is Human: Can American Medicine Learn from Past Mistakes?

“…Keys was convinced that dietary fat led to elevated cholesterol levels, which then caused CVD. 21 Keys presented his diet-heart hypothesis to the World Health Organization in 1955. His research was epidemiologic and could only prove an association, not causality.…”