2016
DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000000556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of altered corticomotor excitability following targeted activation of gluteus maximus training in healthy individuals

Abstract: It has been proposed that strengthening and skill training of gluteus maximus (GM) may be beneficial in treating various knee injuries. Given the redundancy of the hip musculature and the small representational area of GM in the primary motor cortex (M1), learning to activate this muscle before prescribing strength exercises and modifying movement strategy would appear to be important. This study aimed to determine whether a short-term activation training program targeting the GM results in neuroplastic change… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, a stronger response is evoked by a given neural signal. 32 Our results are therefore consistent with the suggestion that the gluteal activation warm-up increased the corticomotor excitability of the glutes acutely. Such a phenomenon would offer an exciting validation of the use of therapeutic exercises to prime performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…That is, a stronger response is evoked by a given neural signal. 32 Our results are therefore consistent with the suggestion that the gluteal activation warm-up increased the corticomotor excitability of the glutes acutely. Such a phenomenon would offer an exciting validation of the use of therapeutic exercises to prime performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The specific details of included studies, incorporating the Downs and Black quality assessment and NHMRC assessment of evidence for each study, are provided in Table . All but one study, which did not have a parallel control group (Fisher et al ., ), were comparative studies having a concurrent control condition (NHMRC study evidence guidelines Grade III‐1 or III‐2, Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Central factors include, but are not limited to, corticomotor (Fisher et al, 2016 ) and motoneuron (Heckman et al, 2009 ) excitability. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%