2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa961c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of an Upper Bound on the Masses of Planets and Its Implications for Giant Planet Formation

Abstract: Celestial bodies with a mass of M ≈ 10 M Jup have been found orbiting nearby stars. It is unknown whether these objects formed like gas-giant planets through core accretion or like stars through gravitational instability. I show that objects with M 4 M Jup orbit metal-rich solar-type dwarf stars, a property associated with core accretion. Objects with M 10 M Jup do not share this property. This transition is coincident with a minimum in the occurrence rate of such objects, suggesting that the maximum mass of a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
128
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
7
128
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also searched for evidence of a correlation between planet occurrence rate and stellar metallicity in order to distinguish between core accretion and other formation mechanisms. There is compelling evidence to suggest that relatively close-in (<10 AU) and low-mass (<10 M Jup ) gas giant planets likely form via core accretion, as they are preferentially found around more metal-rich stars (Fischer & Valenti 2005;Schlaufman 2018). This metallicity correlation disappears for transiting planets larger than ∼8 M Jup , indicating that more massive companions may form via an alternative mechanism, most likely gravitational instability (Schlaufman 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have also searched for evidence of a correlation between planet occurrence rate and stellar metallicity in order to distinguish between core accretion and other formation mechanisms. There is compelling evidence to suggest that relatively close-in (<10 AU) and low-mass (<10 M Jup ) gas giant planets likely form via core accretion, as they are preferentially found around more metal-rich stars (Fischer & Valenti 2005;Schlaufman 2018). This metallicity correlation disappears for transiting planets larger than ∼8 M Jup , indicating that more massive companions may form via an alternative mechanism, most likely gravitational instability (Schlaufman 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spitzer data are taken from Kirkpatrick et al (2019); Leggett et al (2017); Martin et al (2018) and references therein, the trigonometric parallaxes are taken from Kirkpatrick et al (2019); Leggett et al (2017); Martin et al (2018); Smart et al (2018); Theissen (2018) and references therein. In addition, for this work, we determined W1 magnitudes from images downloaded from the unWISE database 2 (Schlafly et al 2019) for four Y dwarfs, WISE J033605.05-014350.4 with W 1 = 18.20 ± 0.10, WISEA J035000.31-565830.5 with W 1 = 18.3 ± 0.2, WISE J064723.23-623235.5 with W 1 = 18.8 ± 0.2, and WISEA J235402.79+024014.1 with W 1 = 18.1 ± 0.3. Figures 11 and 12 are color-magnitude diagrams for the 4 µm and 5 µm filters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compared our results to observations: DI constraints on the frequency of wide orbit companions (Vigan et al 2017), RV constraints on gas giants inside 5 AU (Cumming et al 2008), and correlations with host metallicity from Fischer & Valenti (2005), Santos et al (2017) and Schlaufman (2018). To assess the implications of these constraints we tested two extreme models for gap opening that we named quenched and super migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%