1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that [Phe1ψ(CH2‐NH)Gly2]nociceptin‐(1‐13)‐NH2, a peripheral ORL‐1 receptor antagonist, acts as an agonist in the rat spinal cord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several isolated tissues 18,[29][30][31][32] and in the cardiovascular system of the mouse in vivo, compound 2b behaves as an antagonist, while this pseudopeptide is a potent agonist in several tests on central actions of NC. 11,12,[34][35][36][37] The full agonist activity of compound 2b in CHO NCR cells has been confirmed in different laboratories (present data and 33,45,46 ). The reasons for the dual behavior of compound 2b are at present unknown; however, recent findings suggest that the intrinsic activity of the compound may depend on the number of NC receptors expressed in a given preparation 47 (see ref 38 for a detailed discussion of this topic).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In several isolated tissues 18,[29][30][31][32] and in the cardiovascular system of the mouse in vivo, compound 2b behaves as an antagonist, while this pseudopeptide is a potent agonist in several tests on central actions of NC. 11,12,[34][35][36][37] The full agonist activity of compound 2b in CHO NCR cells has been confirmed in different laboratories (present data and 33,45,46 ). The reasons for the dual behavior of compound 2b are at present unknown; however, recent findings suggest that the intrinsic activity of the compound may depend on the number of NC receptors expressed in a given preparation 47 (see ref 38 for a detailed discussion of this topic).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This report set off a flurry of in vitro and in vivo assays (nicely summarized in Calo et al, 2000b) which showed, to some disappointment, that this peptide acted as an antagonist, partial agonist, or even full agonist, depending on the tissue preparation. Thus, while it showed different levels of partial agonist activity in [ 35 S]GTPγS assays in CHO cells transfected with human or mouse ORL1 (Burnside et al, 2000;Berger et al, 2000), it showed full agonist activity in several in vivo CNS assays (Xu et al, 1998;Grisel et al, 1998;Carpenter and Dickenson, 1998). Similar results were also observed with the partial agonist hexapeptide Ac-RYYRIK-NH 2 (Berger et al, 2000;Burnside et al, 2000).…”
Section: Peptide Ligandssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These findings suggest that [F/G]NC(1-13)NH 2 interacts with central NC receptors controlling food intake and acts as a full agonist. Such a suggestion emerges also from a series of recent reports in which [F/G]NC(1-13)NH 2 has been found to mimic the actions of NC in the rat spinal cord (Candeletti et al 1998;Carpenter and Dickenson 1998;Xu et al 1998), in the mouse brain (Calo' et al 1998a;Grisel et al 1998) or in cells expressing the human ORL1 receptor (Butour et al 1998;Okawa et al 1999). In addition, [F/G]NC(1-13)NH 2 has been demonstrated to act as a partial agonist on NC sites that inhibit noradrenaline release from mouse cerebral cortex slices (Schlicker et al 1998) and in cell cultures expressing low levels of NC receptors (Olianas et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%