1990
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90008-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings

Abstract: Evidence presented here is consistent with a failure of stock prices to reflect fully the implications of current earnings for future earnings. Specifically, the three-day price reactions to announcements of earnings for quarters t + 1 through I + 4 are predictable, based on earnings of quarter r. Even more surprisingly, the signs and magnitudes of the three-day reactions are related to the autocorrelation structure of earnings, as if stock prices fail to reflect the extent to which each firm's earnings series… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

99
836
7
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,781 publications
(968 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
99
836
7
13
Order By: Relevance
“…For larger FTSE 100 firms, the earnings-related news does not have a significant effect on next-period abnormal returns. This result corroborates the findings of Bernard and Thomas (1990) that large firms, due to high investor recognition, tend to have less post-announcement drift. Further, when we consider the relationship between media coverage (MC) and next-period abnormal returns, we see the significant impact of highly visible good news on next-period returns (seen in table 3 for ALL stories) is driven by larger FTSE 100 9.…”
Section: Return Predictability Of News Media Contentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For larger FTSE 100 firms, the earnings-related news does not have a significant effect on next-period abnormal returns. This result corroborates the findings of Bernard and Thomas (1990) that large firms, due to high investor recognition, tend to have less post-announcement drift. Further, when we consider the relationship between media coverage (MC) and next-period abnormal returns, we see the significant impact of highly visible good news on next-period returns (seen in table 3 for ALL stories) is driven by larger FTSE 100 9.…”
Section: Return Predictability Of News Media Contentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Third, the results are unlikely to be explained by risk. As an example, Liu, Whited and Zhang (2007) propose a rational risk-based explanation for the earnings-announcement drift of Bernard and Thomas (1990) and Sloan (1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These components (Manufacturers' New Orders for Consumer Goods and Materials, Manufacturers' New Orders for Nondefense Capital Goods, and the Personal Consumption Expenditure Deflator used to get real Money Supply (M2)) are estimated using a simple AR(2) time series regression. 5 The Appendix provides more background information and details on why this procedure was selected and how it was implemented by TCB. It is important to note that the procedures used in the LEI calculation are explained with extensive details on TCB's website and in their manual (The Conference Board (2001)), which is publicly available.…”
Section: The Leading Economic Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PER is standardized rank of earnings persistence based on AR (1) The results documented in Table 4 do not confirm the expectation of a negative effect of earnings persistence on short-term components and/or a positive effect on long-term components. One possible explanation presented by the literature is that market agents fail to fully recognize the implication of earnings persistence for future earnings (Bernard & Thomas, 1990;Chen, 2013).…”
Section: Firm Value Decomposition: Level Price Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%