2014
DOI: 10.22329/il.v34i4.4107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidential Modals at the Semantic-Argumentative Interface: Appearance Verbs as Indicators of Defeasible Argumentation

Abstract: This contribution aims at providing an argumentative method to account for epistemic modality and evidentiality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Por ejemplo, Rocci (2012) y Musi (2014) centraron el análisis en los verbos can (potere) y must (dovere): el primero es asumido como consecuencia lógica de algo y el segundo se utiliza para denotar una compatibilidad lógica con algo. En este sentido, Musi (2014) analizó la evidencialidad y la modalidad epistémica, a través de la presencia de dichos verbos específicos contextualizados en esquemas de argumentación.…”
Section: Alonso Deunclassified
“…Por ejemplo, Rocci (2012) y Musi (2014) centraron el análisis en los verbos can (potere) y must (dovere): el primero es asumido como consecuencia lógica de algo y el segundo se utiliza para denotar una compatibilidad lógica con algo. En este sentido, Musi (2014) analizó la evidencialidad y la modalidad epistémica, a través de la presencia de dichos verbos específicos contextualizados en esquemas de argumentación.…”
Section: Alonso Deunclassified
“…For a more detailed discussion on the model, see Rigotti and Greco Morasso (2010) and Rigotti and Greco (2019). For a discussion on the distinction between inferential-procedural and material-contextual premises, see Bigi and Greco Morasso (2012) and Musi (2014).…”
Section: Reconstructing Children's Inferences Through the Argumentum mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining the latter with the maxim from the locus from prototype definition "If a prototypical X is defined by a set of characteristics and Y features few or none of these characteristics, then Y cannot be a X", the final conclusion follows that the interview with Litfiba cannot be a front-page picture news. The locus from prototype definition has been elaborated by Musi (2014), who, in her study on the argumentative reconstruction of reasoning crystallized in Italian appearance verbs, discovered the argumentative significance of the prototype, i.e. "the most representative exemplar of the category" and the one that has the majority of common features with the other members of the category and shares the minor number of features with members belonging to other categories.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Argumentative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%