2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolución de 10 años de aplicación de la ventilación mecánica en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda del paciente hematológico ingresado en la unidad de cuidados intensivos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All included studies compared NIV with IMV as the first mechanical ventilation technique in immunocompromised patients with ARF. Settings in the NIV group were as follows: (1) Ventilation modes: two studies [27, 32] used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation only; three [33, 34, 36] solely used bi­level positive airway pressure (Bi­PAP); another five [17, 20, 28, 30, 37] solely used pressure support ventilation (PSV); another one [31] used both CPAP and Bi-PAP; no description was given in the remaining studies. (2) Interfaces: full face mask, face mask, nasal mask or helmet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All included studies compared NIV with IMV as the first mechanical ventilation technique in immunocompromised patients with ARF. Settings in the NIV group were as follows: (1) Ventilation modes: two studies [27, 32] used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation only; three [33, 34, 36] solely used bi­level positive airway pressure (Bi­PAP); another five [17, 20, 28, 30, 37] solely used pressure support ventilation (PSV); another one [31] used both CPAP and Bi-PAP; no description was given in the remaining studies. (2) Interfaces: full face mask, face mask, nasal mask or helmet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another (Gristina 2011) [17] reported that the mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 4 days (SD 4 days) in NIV group, compared to 11 days (SD 4 days) in IMV group ( P value < 0.0001). The rest (B-M 2013) [36] revealed no difference among the two groups ( P value = 0.08).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-ICU mortality in those patients who were successfully managed with NIMV was 22%; whereas in those requiring intubation,the mortality rate was 60% (58% in those initially submitted to IMV and 72% in those intubated after NIMV failure). Only two studies (5,14) reported the causes of death, infection, septic shock, and multiorgan failure as being the most frequent.…”
Section: Initial Ventilatory Strategy and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive ventilatory support (requiring intubation), while improving gas exchange, has been related to a high mortality rate (4). On the contrary, the use of noninvasive ventilation has been associated with better outcomes (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). However, this strategy shows a high failure rate, requiring intubation (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Despite significant advances in treatment strategies for critically ill patients in the ICU, the mortality rate of ARF remains high. [2] Specific diseases or conditions affecting ICU outcomes are well studied, i.e., solid or hematological malignancies, neurological diseases, obesity, septic shock, and renal failure, [3][4][5] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is known to account for the majority of ICU admissions and mortality due to ARF. Cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, osteoporosis, depression, diabetes mellitus (DM), and lung cancer are reported as COPD-related comorbidities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%