Evolution of corporate social responsibility: two sets of explanation

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to advance two sets of explanation on the evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) – one set of explanation in the context of a developed country, USA, and another in the context of a developing country, India. The discussion includes the period after mandatory CSR rules were implemented in India. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper on the historical evolution of CSR in the USA and India. It reviews the chronological evolution of CSR. It compares the phases of CSR evolution between the two countries by tracking their CSR growth curves. Findings This study divides the evolution of CSR in the USA into four phases – conceptualization, introduction, growth and consolidation. In the first two phases, the rate of growth in CSR increases at a decreasing rate; in the growth phase, it increases at an increasing rate which stabilizes in the consolidation phase. In the Indian context, the study considers a three phase growth – conceptualization, introduction and growth. In the first two phases, the growth in CSR curve is inelastic. In the third phase, the growth rate increases but at a rate less than that in the USA. Originality/value Though past research has examined historical evolution of CSR in the US context, scant research has tracked CSR evolution in India. Not many studies have compared the growth of CSR between developed and developing countries. This study also contributes the concept of CSR growth curves to the extant literature on CSR.

Entrepreneurial ecosystem for promoting social innovation in emerging markets: Is corporate social responsibility integration with technology business incubators the right path?

“…Schedule VII included activities related to social causes, such as the eradication of hunger and poverty; promotion of education and gender equality; improvement of the healthcare system, including with respect to women's and children's health; enhancement of environmental sustainability and vocational skills; and contribution to funds set up by the government for relief and the socio-economic development of backward classes, minorities and women, and social business projects. Nonetheless, the growth rate of CSR by firms in India lags behind that of developed countries such as the United States (Mishra, 2019). Jha and Aggrawal (2019) noted that although companies in India may increase their CSR spending because of institutional pressure, they must go a long way to design sustainable CSR strategies.…”

Impact of mandatory corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: the Indian experience

“…The definition of CSR became much clearer from 1970s onwards (Mishra, 2019). While Johnson defined a socially responsible firm as a firm that could balance a multiplicity of interests of stakeholders in addition to shareholders (Johnson, 1971), the Committee for Economic Development (1971) encompassed both economic and non-economic concerns with their "three concentric circles" approach.…”

La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha

“…Desde su concepción como filantropía hasta las nociones de ciudadanía corporativa, valor compartido, y ahora, de la empresa como actor político (Ashrafi et al, 2020;Carroll & Shabana, 2010;Frynas & Yamahaki, 2016;Latapí-Agudelo, et al, 2019). Además, la rse ha sido entendida como un concepto complejo con múltiples orígenes a través de clústeres de teorías (Garriga & Melé, 2004), y recientemente, la literatura se ha interesado en perspectivas contingentes de la rse con contexto de país (Mishra, 2019). Sin embargo, la rse entendida como sostenibilidad organizacional, tiene importantes dificultades, y plantea retos.…”