2017
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of cross-neutralizing antibodies and mapping epitope specificity in plasma of chronic HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naïve children from India

Abstract: Delineating the factors leading to the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) during natural HIV-1 infection and dissecting their epitope specificities generates useful information for vaccine design. This is the first longitudinal study to assess the plasma-neutralizing antibody response and neutralizing determinants in HIV-1-infected children from India. We enrolled 26 and followed up 20 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve, asymptomatic, chronic HIV-1-infected children. Five (19.2 %) baseline … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cut-off of 0.7 defined the 90th-percentile boundary and was used to define ENs (neutralizing ≥90% pseudoviruses), whereas a cut-off of 0.35 (75th-percentile) was used to define BNs (neutralizing ≥60% pseudoviruses) ( Table 1 ). The neutralization scores for known ENs and BNs from previously reported pediatric 9 and adult 10 cohorts were calculated based on the above criteria, confirming the validity of the panel and the scoring system defined herein to decipher pediatric broad and elite neutralizers ( Figure 1E ).…”
Section: Introduction Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A cut-off of 0.7 defined the 90th-percentile boundary and was used to define ENs (neutralizing ≥90% pseudoviruses), whereas a cut-off of 0.35 (75th-percentile) was used to define BNs (neutralizing ≥60% pseudoviruses) ( Table 1 ). The neutralization scores for known ENs and BNs from previously reported pediatric 9 and adult 10 cohorts were calculated based on the above criteria, confirming the validity of the panel and the scoring system defined herein to decipher pediatric broad and elite neutralizers ( Figure 1E ).…”
Section: Introduction Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…HIV-1 infected children have been shown to mount potent plasma broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) earlier than adults and more frequently with multiple bnAb specificities. than adults (46). The bnAb BF520.1 was recently isolated from an infant one-year post-infection (p.i) (4,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Destabilization of the trimer apex has been shown to alter the neutralization susceptibility of HIV-1 Env to antibodies present in the plasma of infected individuals. As L184F mutation resulted in a more open trimer configuration, we next evaluated the sensitivity of L184F mutant to a panel of HIV-1 clade C infected pediatric patient plasma with varied neutralization potency (weak versus strong neutralizers) against the global panel of representative HIV-1 isolates (3537). Patient plasma antibodies neutralizing more than half the global panel were considered strong neutralizers while those neutralizing less than half the panel were considered weak to moderate neutralizers depending on their breadth and potency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, none of the non-nAbs could achieve 50% neutralization (17b, which binds preferentially to the CD4-induced, CCR5 co-receptor binding site epitope on Env achieved a maximum percent neutralization of 32%) (34), suggesting that the L184F mutation did not substantially alter the conformation of the Env. In addition, the L184F mutant virus showed high susceptibility to neutralization by polyclonal antibodies present in the plasma of weak neutralizers (HIV-1 infected patients that do not generate a potent response to HIV-1 Env) (3537). HIV-1 Envs are categorized into tiers based on neutralization susceptibility to plasma antibodies (44, 45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation