To the Editor We read the case report by Zhu and colleagues 1 with great interest. The authors indicated that the "direct evolution from the de Winter to Wellens pattern has never been reported before." 1 However, using the search string de Winter[Title] AND Wellens [Title] in PubMed, we found 2 similar cases, one reported by Samadov and colleagues from Turkey in 2013 2,3 and the other by Li and colleagues from China in 2019. 4 Apparently, Zhu and colleagues 1 were not the first to report the evolution of de Winter syndrome into Wellens syndrome.We would like to address the similarities and differences between these de Winter-to-Wellens cases. All 3 cases began with acute chest pain and showed a de Winter pattern on the results of the electrocardiogram (ECG) taken at pain onset; the pattern then evolved into the Wellens pattern; and results of all 3 coronary angiograms suggested severe stenosis of the left anterior descending branch. However, it is worth noting that Samadov and colleagues 2,3 also captured normal ECG results during an interval when the patient was between de Winter and Wellens syndromes. Li and colleagues 4 also reported that ECG results showed the ST-segment returning to the isoelectric line before evolving into Wellens syndrome. These case reports further suggest a possible intermediate coronary spontaneous recanalization with subsequent reperfusion injury and myocardial stunning to develop the Wellens pattern. In addition, Samadov and colleagues 2,3 reported type I Wellens syndrome and Li and colleagues 4 reported type II Wellens syndrome; however, Zhu and colleagues 1 showed type II Wellens evolving into type I.In conclusion, both de Winter and Wellens syndromes are relatively rare and easily overlooked but characteristic of ECG manifestations indicating acute coronary syndromes. Both are clinically important to early identification of patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome, and both require urgent intervention and treatment.