2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios during the experimental dissolution of limestone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sr was recognized to be released from congruent dissolution of Mg-calcite and strontium probably represents a minor impurity in calcite crystal lattice [7,15]. In this research, Sr/Mg had a similar horizontal trend to Ca/Mg although it was three orders of magnitude lower than Ca/Mg (Ca/Mg and Sr/Mg, R 2 = 0.92, p ≤ 0.01), indicating that Sr, as a minor impurity in limestone, was dissolved out along with dissolution of Ca rather than congruent dissolution with Mg. Molar ratio of 4.01 × 10 −3 for Sr/Mg at inlets was higher than that of 2.42 × 10 −3 in the central lake region, indicating [Sr] enrichment probably associated with different dynamics of Sr and Mg leaching; this might be caused by a substantial release of Mg from dissolving dolomite compared to the decreasing Sr release from Mg-calcite [35]. Land runoff brought in abundant metallic elements and minerals through river input, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + and K + amounted to 4.89 mmol·L −1 and total trace metals reached up to 17.2 × 10 3 nmol·L −1 at 3-I.…”
Section: Surface and Underlying Watermentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Sr was recognized to be released from congruent dissolution of Mg-calcite and strontium probably represents a minor impurity in calcite crystal lattice [7,15]. In this research, Sr/Mg had a similar horizontal trend to Ca/Mg although it was three orders of magnitude lower than Ca/Mg (Ca/Mg and Sr/Mg, R 2 = 0.92, p ≤ 0.01), indicating that Sr, as a minor impurity in limestone, was dissolved out along with dissolution of Ca rather than congruent dissolution with Mg. Molar ratio of 4.01 × 10 −3 for Sr/Mg at inlets was higher than that of 2.42 × 10 −3 in the central lake region, indicating [Sr] enrichment probably associated with different dynamics of Sr and Mg leaching; this might be caused by a substantial release of Mg from dissolving dolomite compared to the decreasing Sr release from Mg-calcite [35]. Land runoff brought in abundant metallic elements and minerals through river input, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + and K + amounted to 4.89 mmol·L −1 and total trace metals reached up to 17.2 × 10 3 nmol·L −1 at 3-I.…”
Section: Surface and Underlying Watermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…SO4 2− played a critical role as electron acceptor [34] during particulates' degradation and unbound Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ in certain ratios (SO4 2− and ratio of Ca/Mg, R 2 = 0.75, p ≤ 0.01). Ca/Mg values were used to indicate the paleo-climatic changes and the dynamics of material elements from limestone dissolution [35]. Molar ratios of Ca/Mg averaged 2.45 at inlets and achieved a peak value of 2.54 at I-2, indicated the preferential dissolution of Ca from Mg-calcite and dolomite or from another fresh mineral surface [24,35].…”
Section: Surface and Underlying Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations