2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties in 2014 and 6063 similar and dissimilar aluminium alloy laminates produced by accumulative roll bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the strongest of aluminum alloys owe their properties to precipitation hardening process (2xxx and 7xxx series), in recent years, a lot of effort has been undertaken to improve their parameters even further by different means [4,5]. These processes include operations as cryogenic rolling, equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), high-pressure torsion (HPT), accumulative extrusion bonding (AEB) and hydrostatic extrusion (HE) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. All operations except cryogenic rolling correspond to severe plastic deformation (SPD) process, in which deformation of material produces fine microstructure, improving its mechanical properties according to the Hall-Petch relationship [6,10,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the strongest of aluminum alloys owe their properties to precipitation hardening process (2xxx and 7xxx series), in recent years, a lot of effort has been undertaken to improve their parameters even further by different means [4,5]. These processes include operations as cryogenic rolling, equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), high-pressure torsion (HPT), accumulative extrusion bonding (AEB) and hydrostatic extrusion (HE) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. All operations except cryogenic rolling correspond to severe plastic deformation (SPD) process, in which deformation of material produces fine microstructure, improving its mechanical properties according to the Hall-Petch relationship [6,10,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in a composite, metal co-deformation is difficult if the metals differ greatly in their flow stresses and hardness [ 15 ]. The harder material is generally more susceptible to necking and rupturing so that the final microstructure is always full of fragments of the harder material in its softer matrix, rather than a continuous laminated structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various metal materials of the same base metals have been used to produce laminate composites, such as AA6061/AA5754 [ 12 ], AA7075/AA1100 [ 13 ], and Al–Li/Al–Li–Zr [ 14 ]. V. G. Arigela et al [ 15 ] produced AA2014/AA6063 composites by ARB and compared the deformation processes in individual layers. However, the strength of the composites was found to drop slightly because they did not undergo aging treatments, and the differences between layers were not maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have addressed the mechanical properties and microstructural alterations of metals and different alloys such as aluminum, copper, nickel, steel, and titanium [11][12][13]7,14,15]. Qualitative and quantitative investigations indicated a decrease in the grain size as well as wide variations in the dislocation density and other microstructural parameters, an increase of strength and hardness, brittleness enhancement, and edge cracking in the prepared samples [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%