2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-018-2074-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of mixing in a microfluidic reverse-staggered herringbone micromixer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the fabrication of the proposed designs is slightly more complex, as it requires fabricating both the main channel structure as well as the groove structure, it is well within the capabilities of typical methods used for microfluidic device development [39]. In particular, the proposed devices can be fabricated using soft-lithography techniques [40,60] based on replica molding transfer to PDMS polymer from silicon stamps prepared using two-layer lithography. The use of oxygen plasma-activated PDMS polymer also provides high wettability for the channel surfaces [60], consistent with the assumption made in the above numerical study of no-slip boundary conditions at all the walls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the fabrication of the proposed designs is slightly more complex, as it requires fabricating both the main channel structure as well as the groove structure, it is well within the capabilities of typical methods used for microfluidic device development [39]. In particular, the proposed devices can be fabricated using soft-lithography techniques [40,60] based on replica molding transfer to PDMS polymer from silicon stamps prepared using two-layer lithography. The use of oxygen plasma-activated PDMS polymer also provides high wettability for the channel surfaces [60], consistent with the assumption made in the above numerical study of no-slip boundary conditions at all the walls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrays of obstacles [28][29][30][31], ridge-groove systems [32][33][34], two-or three-dimensional turns [35,36], and curved channel sections [17,37,38] have been successfully used to exploit the already existent pressure differentials necessary to push the fluids of interest along the microfluidic device, in order to generate cross-sectional flows capable of stretching, folding, and splitting fluid elements conducive to efficient mixing. Aside from a proven ability to reach the necessary mixing quality, passive designs benefit from being accessible to a variety of fabrication methods including soft lithography [39,40], 3D printing [41], and molecular imprinting [42]. This, together with accurate computational modeling of the fluid and reactant dynamics in these devices accessible through a variety of popular CFD packages, has enabled an efficient pipeline for the design, optimization, prototyping, and testing of passive mixers [33,[43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, all the staggered herringbones grooves (SHG) follow a similar approach (Figure 1b). For SHG, a mixing performance of ≥99% at Re = 1 at a mixing length of 5.8 mm was reported [36]. The SHG mixer is a good candidate for flow-through devices in applications that require a high degree of mixing within a relatively small mixing length.…”
Section: Micromixing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic mixers are important components for the rapid mixing of chemical species in the typical low Reynolds number flow of microfluidic applications (27). Monolithic mixers have been fabricated by soft lithography (28,29) and additive manufacturing (30,31). Extrusion-based printing allows for the convenient incorporation of multiple materials within the same structure (32).…”
Section: D Printed Microfluidic Mixersmentioning
confidence: 99%