“…Arrays of obstacles [28][29][30][31], ridge-groove systems [32][33][34], two-or three-dimensional turns [35,36], and curved channel sections [17,37,38] have been successfully used to exploit the already existent pressure differentials necessary to push the fluids of interest along the microfluidic device, in order to generate cross-sectional flows capable of stretching, folding, and splitting fluid elements conducive to efficient mixing. Aside from a proven ability to reach the necessary mixing quality, passive designs benefit from being accessible to a variety of fabrication methods including soft lithography [39,40], 3D printing [41], and molecular imprinting [42]. This, together with accurate computational modeling of the fluid and reactant dynamics in these devices accessible through a variety of popular CFD packages, has enabled an efficient pipeline for the design, optimization, prototyping, and testing of passive mixers [33,[43][44][45].…”