2004
DOI: 10.1080/03091920410001724124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of non-linear α 2-dynamos and taylor's constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few exceptions of the rule that α 2 -dynamos with scalar α-effect are stationary. Fearn & Rahman (2004) solved the Navier-Stokes equation and a mean-field induction equation for an α 2 -dynamo model with a radial dependence of the α-effect given by α ∝ sin π(r − R in ). This radial profile leads to a vanishing α-effect at the boundaries of the fluid outer core but the α-effect does not show any zero within the interior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few exceptions of the rule that α 2 -dynamos with scalar α-effect are stationary. Fearn & Rahman (2004) solved the Navier-Stokes equation and a mean-field induction equation for an α 2 -dynamo model with a radial dependence of the α-effect given by α ∝ sin π(r − R in ). This radial profile leads to a vanishing α-effect at the boundaries of the fluid outer core but the α-effect does not show any zero within the interior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…energy has dropped to approximately one hundredth of its peak value). We still find that the flow is dominated by the geostrophic component and varies together with the magnetic field, although we note that the relative role of the geostrophic flow (compared with the ageostrophic flow) is time dependent, for example, taking a more dominant role in the minimal energy state (see also Fearn & Rahman 2004). The flow is enslaved to the magnetic field, where the energy of u m and u g and the energy of B reaches maxima and minima simultaneously.…”
Section: A Taylor State Dynamo Model Driven By the α 2 L -Effectmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This can be easily understood: a finite time step ∆t cannot be used together with Taylor's solution that considers ∂T /∂t, just as Newton's method does not find the root of an equation in one step unless the equation is linear. In this vein, to quote a 2004 review, "as elegant as this [Taylor's] prescription undoubtedly is, no-one has ever succeeded in following it" (Rüdiger & Hollerbach 2004), although convincing demonstrations of viscosity-independent solutions (the approach to the Taylor state) have been made using increasingly weak viscosity (Hollerbach & Ierley 1991;Jault 1995;Fearn & Rahman 2004). It is our contention that central to any robust algorithm for time stepping the magnetostrophic equations must be the concept of optimal control, a technique we shall now go on to describe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that a model of α 2 -dynamo for scalar α-effect have difficulties to explain the reversals. However, there are series of works in which it is shown that for a some special radial inhomogeneity of the α-effect, reversals in α 2 -dynamo can arise [3][4][5]. Therefore, we can say that in order to reproduce the reversal phenomenon in α 2 -dynamo, it is necessary to take into account spatial inhomogeneities.…”
Section: α 2 -And α 2 ω-Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the mean-field models and the concept of the alpha-effect become indispensable. These models make it possible to obtain long-term realizations of the field dynamics, but the solutions depend very much on the predetermined spatial structure of the alpha-effect in both scalar and anisotropic cases [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%