2007
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of spiral galaxies in modified gravity

Abstract: We compare N-body simulations of isolated galaxies performed in both frameworks of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) and Newtonian gravity with dark matter (DM). We have developed a multigrid code able to efficiently solve the modified Poisson equation derived from the Lagrangian formalism AQUAL. We take particular care of the boundary conditions that are a crucial point in MOND. The 3-dimensional dynamics of initially identical stellar discs is studied in both models. In Newtonian gravity the live DM halo is… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
151
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Milgromian dynamics, galaxy evolution and interactions have been shown, with the first available simulations, to naturallly reproduce observational properties of galaxies (Combes & Tiret 2010;Tiret & Combes 2007), and TDGs form readily (Tiret & Combes 2008).…”
Section: No Dark Matter But Modified Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Milgromian dynamics, galaxy evolution and interactions have been shown, with the first available simulations, to naturallly reproduce observational properties of galaxies (Combes & Tiret 2010;Tiret & Combes 2007), and TDGs form readily (Tiret & Combes 2008).…”
Section: No Dark Matter But Modified Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a new full multigrid (FMG) solver in the same spirit as Brada & Milgrom (1995) and Tiret & Combes (2007). It solves Eq.…”
Section: Appendix A: Full Multi-grid Mond Potential Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that on galactic scales MOND can explain many phenomena better than CDM (Begmann 1989;Begmann et al 1991;Sanders & McGaugh 2002;A&A 527, A33 (2011) Sanchez-Salcedo & Hernandez 2007; Haghi et al 2006;Malekjani et al 2009;Gentile et al 2007;Milgrom 1994;Brada & Milgrom 2000;Milgrom 1995;Wu et al 2008;Tiret & Combes 2007;Hasani et al 2010). MOND has been generalized to a general-relativistic version (Bekenstein 2004;Sanders 2005;Zlosnik et al 2007;Milgrom 2009), making it possible to test its predictions for gravitational lensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%