Volume 3: Heat Transfer, Parts a and B 2006
DOI: 10.1115/gt2006-91246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Surface Deposits on a High Pressure Turbine Blade: Part I — Physical Characteristics

Abstract: Turbine blade coupons with three different surface treatments were exposed to deposition conditions in an accelerated deposition facility. The facility simulates the flow conditions at the inlet to a first stage high pressure turbine (T = 1150°C, M = 0.31). The combustor exit flow is seeded with dust particulate that would typically be ingested by a large utility power plant. The three coupon surface treatments included: (1) bare polished metal, (2) polished thermal barrier coating with bondcoat, and (3) unpol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at the highest blowing ratio of 1.0 there was no evidence of deposition in the holes. These results appear to agree with the work of ( [16], [17]) that the cooling jets both deflect smaller particles away and lower the surface temperature of the component to reduce the overall amount of deposition.…”
Section: Blowing Ratio Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, at the highest blowing ratio of 1.0 there was no evidence of deposition in the holes. These results appear to agree with the work of ( [16], [17]) that the cooling jets both deflect smaller particles away and lower the surface temperature of the component to reduce the overall amount of deposition.…”
Section: Blowing Ratio Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Sra or average roughness increased by 365% while the RMS averaged roughness increased by 240%. The increase in Sra was much larger than the increase reported in Wammack et al [17] which reported an increase of approximately 50%. In the current study the Sra value increased from 17 to 79 m while in [17] the increase was from 10 to 15 m.…”
Section: Effects Of Different Particulate Loadingcontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The particle temperature on impact is clearly a key parameter, although the substrate temperature, roughness and motion can also be important. Lower deposition rates are observed on cooler [19] and smoother [20] surfaces. It has also been noted [4,21] that deposition rates are much higher on static surfaces, such as platforms and guide vanes, than on rotating components, such as blades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%