2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the cloud field and wind structure of Jupiter's highest speed jet during a huge disturbance

Abstract: Aims. Despite the banded visual aspect of cloud patterns in Jupiter, high resolution images indicate that these regions are markedly turbulent. One region of particular interest is the north temperate belt (NTB) at 21 • N planetocentric latitude, where the most intense Jovian jet resides with eastward peak speeds of 160−180 m s −1 . Almost every 15 years, the NTB is known to experience an eruption or disturbance that dramatically changes its appearance, a phenomenon known as NTB disturbance (NTBD). In this wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEBD and NTBD planetary‐scale disturbances represent one of the major challenges to understand Jupiter's atmospheric dynamics, but at the same time the underlying physics can give us important insights into the parameters that define the upper troposphere, beneath the upper clouds, such as the abundance of water needed to initiate moist convection and the vertical structure of winds and temperature. They are also important because they give us information about the nature of Jupiter's winds through the turbulence pattern the plumes generate in their wake (vortices, swirls, filaments, and waves) and on how they transfer or extract energy and momentum from or to the zonal flow, changing the wind profile as reported in this paper [ Sánchez‐Lavega et al ., ; Barrado‐Izagirre et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEBD and NTBD planetary‐scale disturbances represent one of the major challenges to understand Jupiter's atmospheric dynamics, but at the same time the underlying physics can give us important insights into the parameters that define the upper troposphere, beneath the upper clouds, such as the abundance of water needed to initiate moist convection and the vertical structure of winds and temperature. They are also important because they give us information about the nature of Jupiter's winds through the turbulence pattern the plumes generate in their wake (vortices, swirls, filaments, and waves) and on how they transfer or extract energy and momentum from or to the zonal flow, changing the wind profile as reported in this paper [ Sánchez‐Lavega et al ., ; Barrado‐Izagirre et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 and 11). This is the latitude of the NTB, where the fastest jet stream lies and where planetaryscale convective disturbances (NTBD) developed with some recurrence (Sánchez-Lavega et al 1990;García-Melendo et al 2005), the last one having occurred in 2007 (Sánchez- Lavega et al 2008;Barrado-Izagirre et al 2009a). …”
Section: Long-term Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some of the bands' morphology changes in periods of years (Peek 1958;Chapman & Reese 1968;Reese 1972;Minton 1972a,b;Smith & Hunt 1976;Sánchez-Lavega & Rodrigo 1985;Rogers 1995;Sánchez-Lavega & Gómez 1996;Sánchez-Lavega et al 1996;Fletcher et al 2011;Pérez-Hoyos et al 2012), the wind profile maintains a remarkable temporal stability. Furthermore, this zonal wind profile is not strongly affected by the dynamic perturbations at cloud level, such as those developed by convective storms like the South Equatorial Belt Disturbance (SEBD; Sánchez-Lavega et al 1996;Sánchez-Lavega & Gómez 1996) and the North Temperate Belt Disturbance (NTBD) (García-Melendo et al 2005Sánchez-Lavega et al 2008;Barrado-Izagirre et al 2009a). Even large impacts on the planet such as those of 1994 and 2009 (Hammel et al 1995(Hammel et al , 2010Sánchez-Lavega et al 1998, which released energies at the impact's locations of 10 22 and 10 20 joules, respectively, were not able to alter the winds at the latitudes of the impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations