2018
DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000000649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the pericardiocentesis technique

Abstract: : Pericardiocentesis is a valuable technique for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, although it may be associated with potentially serious complications. Through the years, many different imaging approaches have been described to reduce the complication rate of the procedure. This systematic review provides a focused overview of the different techniques developed in recent years to reduce the procedural complications and to increase the related success rate. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Procedural ultrasound guidance has become the standard of care when performing pericardiocentesis as treatment of cardiac tamponade. It has been found to be safe, effective, and easy to perform, with minimal complications and increased success rates, even in patients with coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia [6,10]. Typical approaches include subxiphoid, apical, and parasternal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Procedural ultrasound guidance has become the standard of care when performing pericardiocentesis as treatment of cardiac tamponade. It has been found to be safe, effective, and easy to perform, with minimal complications and increased success rates, even in patients with coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia [6,10]. Typical approaches include subxiphoid, apical, and parasternal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical approaches include subxiphoid, apical, and parasternal. However, the apical approach is typically avoided due to a higher risk of ventricular puncture [6]. Utilization of POCUS has been found to provide rapid, noninvasive differentiation of shock as well as reduce procedural complications and improve patient safety [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since its rst introduction, ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis procedure has been re ned and shaped into better techniques with different approaches [4]. The older practice used echocardiography to diagnose pericardial effusion and locate the best site for puncture [5]. This method, known as echocardiography-assisted pericardiocentesis, does not provide continuous ultrasound visualization of needle trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, known as echocardiography-assisted pericardiocentesis, does not provide continuous ultrasound visualization of needle trajectory. The newer approach is a true echocardiography-guided procedure that uses ultrasound transducer to guide the needle, allowing the clinician to avoid injury to surrounding structures [5,6]. This is a case report of our experience with a novel subcostal in-plane ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis using linear transducer for a patient with cardiac tamponade in the emergency department (ED).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%