2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of trading strategies with flexible structures: A configuration comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giving support in the first instance to our results on the profitability of learned trading rules over B&H strategies, the study by Martín et al (2018) on the generation of trading rules based on technical indicators for the S&P 500 through a methodology based on the refinements of GA showed that the B&H can reasonably be beaten by the implemented GP strategy. However, Martín et al 's (2018) study time-dependency of the algorithm performances was also evidenced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Giving support in the first instance to our results on the profitability of learned trading rules over B&H strategies, the study by Martín et al (2018) on the generation of trading rules based on technical indicators for the S&P 500 through a methodology based on the refinements of GA showed that the B&H can reasonably be beaten by the implemented GP strategy. However, Martín et al 's (2018) study time-dependency of the algorithm performances was also evidenced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Giving support in the first instance to our results on the profitability of learned trading rules over B&H strategies, the study by Martín et al (2018) on the generation of trading rules based on technical indicators for the S&P 500 through a methodology based on the refinements of GA showed that the B&H can reasonably be beaten by the implemented GP strategy. However, Martín et al 's (2018) study time-dependency of the algorithm performances was also evidenced. The referred dependency trait from the use of the GA-based approaches showed generated rules in the range 78–90.5% in cases of either improving or beating the B&H. Given the relatively short timeframe of our dataset for analysis (2013–2017) compared to that analyzed in Martín et al (2018), we may infer that more than the time-dependency commonly observed in Martín et al (2018) the outperformance of the index during the timeframe of our study may presumably play a determinant role in the algorithm learning process and supported the effects on maximizing our function ( returns ), and consequently, had a positive impact mostly on the GA-based approach over the alternatives B&H and technical only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 10 Performing a sample decoding in GE [60] The purpose and main cycle are basically the same as standard GP, but they differ in the way that solutions are created and updated [61]. Figure 10 shows an example of decoding with GE.…”
Section: Grammar Evolution (Ge)mentioning
confidence: 99%