2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of vulnerability of communities facing repeated hazards

Abstract: The decisions that individuals make when recovering from and adapting to repeated hazards affect a region’s vulnerability in future hazards. As such, community vulnerability is not a static property but rather a dynamic property dependent on behavioral responses to repeated hazards and damage. This paper is the first of its kind to build a framework that addresses the complex interactions between repeated hazards, regional damage, mitigation decisions, and community vulnerability. The framework enables researc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, both the actions of individual agents and the public composed by a collection of agents result in the key interfering driving forces for changes in flood risk [88]. Often, the actions of individuals and governments are an adaptation to flooding events [89][90][91][92]. When a flood affects a relevant share of a house or the infrastructure of the floodplain, individuals urge the government to act.…”
Section: Adaptation In Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, both the actions of individual agents and the public composed by a collection of agents result in the key interfering driving forces for changes in flood risk [88]. Often, the actions of individuals and governments are an adaptation to flooding events [89][90][91][92]. When a flood affects a relevant share of a house or the infrastructure of the floodplain, individuals urge the government to act.…”
Section: Adaptation In Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work builds conceptually from Reilly, Guikema et al. (2017), which builds an ABM to explore how homeowners interact with their hazard environment, and how their decisions could impact their risk over time. The current work expands this by considering more complex decision rules grounded in utility theory, by considering different hazard environments, and, central to this work, by considering the role that learning has on the distribution of outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is unlikely that an AMB can meaningfully represent all structural inequities that are present in communities, it can apply assumptions and constraints on each agent that mimic some of the constraints faced by actual members of the community. 7 See Reilly, Guikema, Zhu, and Igusa (2017) for a topical discussion and framework regarding applying ABMs to the problem of repeated hazards in communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Reilly, Guikema, Zhu, and Igusa (2017) for a topical discussion and framework regarding applying ABMs to the problem of repeated hazards in communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%