2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121411109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of wild cereals during 28 years of global warming in Israel

Abstract: Climate change is a major environmental stress threatening biodiversity and human civilization. The best hope to secure staple food for humans and animal feed by future crop improvement depends on wild progenitors. We examined 10 wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides Koern.) populations and 10 wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum K. Koch) populations in Israel, sampling them in 1980 and again in 2008, and performed phenotypic and genotypic analyses on the collected samples. We witnessed the profound adaptive chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
195
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
195
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the observed patterns are similar to previous studies, and consistent with local adaptation, the analysis of neutral demographic models suggested a strong demographic contribution to the observed structure, which does not support a simple selectionist explanation, particularly in EC1. Differences from previous studies indicate an effect of marker types, collections and temporal changes in the population (Nevo et al, 2012). Future studies of wild barley adaptation should be carried out with additional samples around microsites such as the EC and be combined them with large systematic collections like the Barley1K (Hubner et al, 2009) to put the local patterns of genetic variation into a broader geographic context.…”
Section: Gene Flow Within Ec1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the observed patterns are similar to previous studies, and consistent with local adaptation, the analysis of neutral demographic models suggested a strong demographic contribution to the observed structure, which does not support a simple selectionist explanation, particularly in EC1. Differences from previous studies indicate an effect of marker types, collections and temporal changes in the population (Nevo et al, 2012). Future studies of wild barley adaptation should be carried out with additional samples around microsites such as the EC and be combined them with large systematic collections like the Barley1K (Hubner et al, 2009) to put the local patterns of genetic variation into a broader geographic context.…”
Section: Gene Flow Within Ec1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing phenotypes, fitness components, and allelic richness in lineages derived from seeds collected before and after environmental change, Franks et al (2007) detected rapid evolution in response to drought and Nevo et al (2012) uncovered evolution in response to gradually changing climates. Indeed, a recent largescale effort to store seeds has the explicit goal of providing lineages for future studies of the evolutionary response to temporal variation, especially in the context of climate change (for review, see Shaw and Etterson, 2012).…”
Section: Resurrecting Predisturbance Lineages and Following Up On Prementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resurrection studies can estimate the rate of trait evolution; investigate the fitness consequences of climate change; dissect the genetic basis of rapid adaptation to disturbance with mapping populations and genomic approaches; distinguish between plasticity and adaptation; and test hypotheses about how specific environmental perturbations select on complex traits and plasticity (hypotheses 1, 2, 3, and 5; see Franks et al, 2007;Nevo et al, 2012;Shaw and Etterson, 2012). These investigations could also determine whether populations can evolve to rely on new triggers for life history transitions as temperature, photoperiod and other environmental cues become decoupled from each other.…”
Section: Resurrecting Predisturbance Lineages and Following Up On Prementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately three-quarters of global production is used for animal feed, 20% is malted for use in alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, and 5% as an ingredient in a range of food products 2 . Barley is widely adapted to diverse environmental conditions and is more stress tolerant than its close relative wheat 3 . As a result, barley remains a major food source in poorer countries 4 , maintaining harvestable yields in harsh and marginal environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%