1997
DOI: 10.1086/304890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution sincez= 0.5 of the Morphology‐Density Relation for Clusters of Galaxies

Abstract: Using traditional morphological classifications of galaxies in 10 intermediate-redshift (z ∼ 0.5) clusters observed with WFPC-2 on the Hubble Space Telescope, we derive relations between morphology and local galaxy density similar to that found by Dressler for low-redshift clusters. Taken collectively, the "morphology-density" relationship, T − Σ , for these more distant, presumably younger clusters is qualitatively similar to that found for the local sample, but a detailed comparison shows two substantial dif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

128
1,290
9
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,035 publications
(1,435 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
128
1,290
9
8
Order By: Relevance
“…of galaxies can be computed considering the projected distances D p, n to the nth nearest neighbour, and can be used to study the effect of the environment on the distribution of galactic types, as done by Dressler (Dressler 1980;Dressler et al 1997). Similarly, when spectroscopic redshifts are available, it is possible to compute the three-dimensional (non projected) distance D n to the nth nearest neighbour and derive a volume density…”
Section: (2+1)-dimensional Density From Photometric Redshiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of galaxies can be computed considering the projected distances D p, n to the nth nearest neighbour, and can be used to study the effect of the environment on the distribution of galactic types, as done by Dressler (Dressler 1980;Dressler et al 1997). Similarly, when spectroscopic redshifts are available, it is possible to compute the three-dimensional (non projected) distance D n to the nth nearest neighbour and derive a volume density…”
Section: (2+1)-dimensional Density From Photometric Redshiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ellipticals look round or football-shaped, with modest ellipticities, or equivalently, large axis ratios. On the other hand, the ellipticity distribution of S0 galaxies is peaked at $ 0:5, while that of spirals is nearly flat at almost all ellipticities (Sandage, Freeman, & Stokes 1970;van den Bergh 1990;Fasano & Vio 1991;Franx, Illingworth, & de Zeeuw 1991;Lambas, Maddox, & Loveday 1992;Jørgensen & Franx 1994;Andreon et al 1996;Dressler et al 1997). Figure 18 presents the ellipticity distribution of the 145 GSS QS-E/S0's with 16:5 < I < 22 as the thick histogram (z phot sample included).…”
Section: Ellipticity Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do that we simply assume that the fraction of S0 galaxies in clusters decreases by 12% every Gyr from z=0 up z=0.5 and remains constant afterwards. This assumption is based on results of Dressler et al (1997) indicating that the fraction of S0 in clusters at z=0.5 is 2 to 3 times lower than at z=0.…”
Section: Time Evolution Of Abundances and Energymentioning
confidence: 99%