2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3773-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution Strategies for IPO Underpricing Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Joshi (2017) notes that linear regression is not suitable for classification because it relies on linearly interconnected data, while decision tree is a compatible algorithm for classification. Most IPO performance research has been performed on linear regression models, but in this study we find previous research using the decision tree algorithm (Basti, Kuzey, & Delen, 2015;Chen, Chen, & Cheng, 2010;Chen & Cheng, 2012;Han, 2016;Quintana, Luque, Valls, & Isasi, 2012;Quintana, Sáez, & Isasi, 2017). We find that machine learning algorithms (the decision tree is known in this case as supervised learning) contain fewer error predictions than linear regression.…”
Section: Decision Tree Algorithm Model For Ipo Researchmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Joshi (2017) notes that linear regression is not suitable for classification because it relies on linearly interconnected data, while decision tree is a compatible algorithm for classification. Most IPO performance research has been performed on linear regression models, but in this study we find previous research using the decision tree algorithm (Basti, Kuzey, & Delen, 2015;Chen, Chen, & Cheng, 2010;Chen & Cheng, 2012;Han, 2016;Quintana, Luque, Valls, & Isasi, 2012;Quintana, Sáez, & Isasi, 2017). We find that machine learning algorithms (the decision tree is known in this case as supervised learning) contain fewer error predictions than linear regression.…”
Section: Decision Tree Algorithm Model For Ipo Researchmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, various market environments could not be verified due to the limitation of using data for a relatively short period from 1996 to 1999. Quintana et al [15] presented strategies for IPO underpricing prediction and Esfahanipour et al [16] examined probability of withdrawal and underpricing of IPO stock using neural network and fuzzy regression. They found that the probability of IPO withdrawal plays an important role in precise evaluation of underpricing.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%