1971
DOI: 10.1016/0016-6480(71)90184-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary biology of prolactins and somatotropins II. Electrophoretic comparison of tetrapod somatotropins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The running gel was made with acrylamide (75 g/1), pH 8-9, and a tris-glycine buffer system, pH 8-6, was used. The fastest migrating band was determined as PRL (Nicoll and Nichols, 1971;Yamamoto et al, 1977). The stained PRL band was estimated by densitometric measurement using a recording and integrating densitometer (OZMOR R-802) with 4-mm slit and 570 ^m filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The running gel was made with acrylamide (75 g/1), pH 8-9, and a tris-glycine buffer system, pH 8-6, was used. The fastest migrating band was determined as PRL (Nicoll and Nichols, 1971;Yamamoto et al, 1977). The stained PRL band was estimated by densitometric measurement using a recording and integrating densitometer (OZMOR R-802) with 4-mm slit and 570 ^m filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data show that under different electrophor etic conditions, the PRL band of the hamster standard, as well as those of the samples from intact and blinded ham sters, run identically. While it is possible that a structurally related pituitary protein such as a growth hormone (GH) could contaminate the PRL band, this seems rather unlikely since GH in both rat and hamster pituitary homogenates runs far behind PRL during polyacrylamide disc gel elec trophoresis [20,21]. Furthermore, the results of the present study confirm the work of others showing that both rat and mouse PRLs run behind hamster PRL during electrophore sis [10,20,21]; thus, this technique is capable of separating very closely related molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been applied to the separation of hormones from pituitary homogenates from rats (Jones et al 1965;Kragt and Meites 1966;Hodges and McShan 1970), mice , eels (Knight et al 1970), and flounders (Chadwick 1970). Recently, electrophoresis has been used to demonstrate the existence of prolactin and growth hormone as separate entities in a variety of vertebrate species from fishes to mammals (Nicoll and Nichols 1971;. The quantity of prolactin in pituitaries or in culture media has been determined by measuring the optical density of Wesent address: Hormone Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143. the stained bands after electrophoretic separation Nicoll et al 1969;Ball and Ingleton 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%