1989
DOI: 10.2307/2389500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Demography of a Bruchid Beetle. II. Physiological Manipulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dung) was limited, yellow dung fly larvae of all lines grew only slightly slower to emerge earlier and smaller. This response is rare in general (Stearns & Koella, 1986) but common in species that are regularly threatened by habitat depletion (Møller et al. , 1989; Newman, 1992; Juliano & Stoffregen, 1994; Blanckenhorn, 1998, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dung) was limited, yellow dung fly larvae of all lines grew only slightly slower to emerge earlier and smaller. This response is rare in general (Stearns & Koella, 1986) but common in species that are regularly threatened by habitat depletion (Møller et al. , 1989; Newman, 1992; Juliano & Stoffregen, 1994; Blanckenhorn, 1998, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the acquisition of nutritional resources during the adult stage should affect insect fitness. There is some evidence that adult feeding influences bruchid longevity, fecundity, and egg size (Møller et al., 1989; Fox, 1993; Fox & Dingle, 1994; Takakura, 2004). However, to our knowledge, no study has addressed how the larval host affects fitness consequences of adult feeding in seed beetles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are many examples providing evidence for the central role of physiologically based trade-offs (Sibly and Calow 1986;Roff 1992;Stearns 1992) and their hormonal control (Ketterson andNolan 1992, 1999;Finch and Rose 1995) in life histories. For example, high reproductive effort is associated with poor moult (Hemborg and Lundberg 1998), reduced immunological status (Ots and Hõ rak 1996), and reduced investment in sexual ornamentation in birds (Gustafsson et al 1995); reduced growth in guppies (Reznick 1996); flight capability in crickets (Zera et al 1998); and longevity in insects (Møller et al 1989;Chipendale et al 1993) and birds (McCleery et al 1996). Our present aim is specifically to incorporate physiological trade-offs into a lifehistory model, based on empirical data for the house mouse, Mus musculus, to determine whether the phenomenon of life extension through calorie restriction can be satisfactorily explained as an evolutionary adaptation and what preconditions might be required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%