No abstract

Most life history traits are positively influenced by body size, whereas disadvantages of large body size are poorly documented. To investigate presumed intrinsic costs of large size in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria; Diptera: Scathophagidae), we established two replicates each of three body size laboratory selection lines (small, control and large; selection on males only), and subjected flies of the resulting extended body size range to various abiotic stresses. Response to selection was symmetrical in the small and large lines (realized h2 = 0.16–0.18). After 24 generations of selection body size had changed by roughly 10%. Female size showed a correlated response to selection on male size, whereas sexual size dimorphism did not change. Development time also showed a correlated response as, similar to food limited flies, small line flies emerged earlier at smaller body size. At the lowest larval food limit possible, flies of all lines emerged at the same small body size after roughly the same development time; so overall phenotypic plasticity in body size and development time strongly increased following selection. Juvenile mortality increased markedly when food was extremely limited, large line flies showing highest mortality. Winter frost disproportionately killed large (line) flies because of their longer development times. Mortality at high temperatures was high but size‐selective effects were inconsistent. In all environments the larger males suffered more. Initial growth rate was higher for males and at unlimited food. Small line individuals of both sexes grew slowest at unlimited larval food but fastest at limited larval food, suggesting a physiological cost of fast growth. Overall, extension of the natural body size range by artificial selection revealed some otherwise cryptic intrinsic juvenile viability costs of large size, mediated by longer development or faster growth, but only in stressful environments.

Previous univariate studies of the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria) have demonstrated strong sexual selection, in terms of mating success, on male size (estimated as hind tibia length). To identify specific target(s) of selection on body size and possible conflicting selection pressures on particular body parts, two multivariate field studies of sexual selection were conducted. In one study using point samples from three populations, we assessed several morphological traits, including genital traits and measures of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of all paired traits. There was sexual selection for large male size in general, confirming previous, univariate studies. With the possible exception of thorax width, which was selected in the opposite direction, no main target of selection was identified, as most morphological traits were highly correlated. There was no detectable sexual selection on the male external genital structures assessed. In a second study using multiple samples from one population, we included physiological measures of energy reserves (lipids, glucose and glycogen) known to affect mating success, in addition to trait size and FA of wings and legs. Inclusion of physiological traits is rare in phenomenological studies of selection. This study again confirmed the mating advantage of large males, and additionally showed independent positive influences of lipid and glucose but not glycogen levels. FA in paired traits generally did not affect male mating success, but was negatively correlated with energy reserves. Our study suggests that inclusion of physiological measures and genital traits in phenomenological studies of selection would be fruitful in other species.