2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00587.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the yellow dung fly

Abstract: Previous univariate studies of the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria) have demonstrated strong sexual selection, in terms of mating success, on male size (estimated as hind tibia length). To identify specific target(s) of selection on body size and possible conflicting selection pressures on particular body parts, two multivariate field studies of sexual selection were conducted. In one study using point samples from three populations, we assessed several morphological traits, including genital traits a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is the general pattern (reviewed in Hosken and Stockley, 2004), work on one of our study species (S. stercoraria) found paired and unpaired males in the field did not differ in clasper length (Blanckenhorn et al, 2003). However, that study only considers one component of sexual selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…While this is the general pattern (reviewed in Hosken and Stockley, 2004), work on one of our study species (S. stercoraria) found paired and unpaired males in the field did not differ in clasper length (Blanckenhorn et al, 2003). However, that study only considers one component of sexual selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…However, correcting for multiple tests has not become standard in selection analyses (e.g. Blanckenhorn et al 2003). Therefore, we also indicate results that are significant at the 0.05 level.…”
Section: Selection On Male Morphologymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…I n humans, as in other species, sex differences in size and shape are attributed to divergent effects of morphology on the survival or reproductive success of each sex (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). For human females, smaller waist relative to hips (WHR), larger breasts, and longer legs relative to height have been attributed to fecundity selection and are perceived as attractive by males (8,11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%