2009
DOI: 10.1159/000223071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Diversity and Turn-Over of Sex Determination in Teleost Fishes

Abstract: Sex determination, due to the obvious association with reproduction and Darwinian fitness, has been traditionally assumed to be a relatively conserved trait. However, research on teleost fishes has shown that this need not be the case, as these animals display a remarkable diversity in the ways that they determine sex. These different mechanisms, which include constitutive genetic mechanisms on sex chromosomes, polygenic constitutive mechanisms, environmental influences, hermaphroditism, and unisexuality have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
143
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
2
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation points to a relatively recent evolutionary origin for the tongue sole sex chromosome pair, where degeneration on the W chromosome has not progressed to a stage at which almost its entire original gene content has disappeared. We determined the age of the tongue sole sex chromosomes to be about 30 million years (Supplementary Table 31), which is consistent with the general view that fish have young sex chromosomes [13][14][15] . This age contrasts with the hundreds of millions of years for the ancestry of the mammalian Y and avian W chromosomes 1,41 and could serve to explain why there are still many intact genes in the non-recombining region of the tongue sole W chromosome.…”
Section: Genomic Organization and Evolution Of Z And Wsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation points to a relatively recent evolutionary origin for the tongue sole sex chromosome pair, where degeneration on the W chromosome has not progressed to a stage at which almost its entire original gene content has disappeared. We determined the age of the tongue sole sex chromosomes to be about 30 million years (Supplementary Table 31), which is consistent with the general view that fish have young sex chromosomes [13][14][15] . This age contrasts with the hundreds of millions of years for the ancestry of the mammalian Y and avian W chromosomes 1,41 and could serve to explain why there are still many intact genes in the non-recombining region of the tongue sole W chromosome.…”
Section: Genomic Organization and Evolution Of Z And Wsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We therefore reasoned that an evolutionarily young W chromosome Whole-genome sequence of a flatfish provides insights into ZW sex chromosome evolution and adaptation to a benthic lifestyle A r t i c l e s should be more amenable for sequencing than the highly degenerated, up to 200-million-year-old W chromosome of birds and would also provide insights into the early steps of W-chromosome evolution. Fish have long been known to have relatively young sex chromosomes [13][14][15] . We selected a flatfish for our study on the basis that these fish would have young sex chromosomes and offer the advantage of a relatively small genome, one that is not much larger than that of pufferfishes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mechanism by which the sex differentiation pathway is triggered varies widely (Marin and Baker, 1998;Herpin and Schartl, 2011). The fact that two different regions determine sex in closely related species of Cottus indicates that factors controlling a conserved sex determination pathway evolve rapidly and have a fast turnover, which is not astonishing given the results from other fish species (Mank and Avise, 2009). Detailed genetic studies will have to reveal whether the same genes are repeatedly recruited in different lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that sex chromosomes in fish are mostly homomorphic and not differentiated (Ohno 1974), which is in contrast to the degenerated Y and W chromosomes in mammals (Graves 2006) and birds (Takagi and Sasaki 1974), respectively. This is one possible explanation for the viable combination of different sex chromosomal systems within a single species or population of fish (Parnell and Streelman 2013) and could be a mechanistic reason why sex chromosome turnovers occur easily and frequently in this group (Mank and Avise 2009). Additionally, fish can have more complex sex chromosomal systems involving more than one chromosome pair (see Figure 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%