2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary modelling of the macro-economic impacts of catastrophic flood events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In standard expected utility theory, individuals maximize their expected utility by comparing the expected utility value (outcome × probability) of different strategies . This decision model assumes that households are fully informed, rational, self‐interested agents . However, individual behavior with respect to low‐probability/high‐impact risk is often better described by bounded rationality, which is characterized by the limited information‐processing capacities of the decisionmaker itself and limited information availability .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In standard expected utility theory, individuals maximize their expected utility by comparing the expected utility value (outcome × probability) of different strategies . This decision model assumes that households are fully informed, rational, self‐interested agents . However, individual behavior with respect to low‐probability/high‐impact risk is often better described by bounded rationality, which is characterized by the limited information‐processing capacities of the decisionmaker itself and limited information availability .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision model assumes that households are fully informed, rational, self‐interested agents . However, individual behavior with respect to low‐probability/high‐impact risk is often better described by bounded rationality, which is characterized by the limited information‐processing capacities of the decisionmaker itself and limited information availability . Other decision‐making models, like prospect theory, try to account for bounded rationality in individual processing of probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, climate scientists, hydrologists, water resource engineers, urban planners, economists, social and policy scientists, health scientists and policy makers need to work together to ensure the resulting models adequately represent plausible future trajectories of the human–natural water system. Such efforts can learn from recent advances in minimal, exploratory modelling that provides insight into how different natural, built and social systems might interact and co‐evolve based on adaptive behavioural responses that reflect social and technological learning (Di Baldassarre et al, ; Safarzyńska, Brouwer, & Hofkes, ). Integrated modelling and assessment frameworks should allow for different levels of abstraction, facilitating learning and enabling different stakeholders to be involved in decision‐making processes.…”
Section: Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, household decisions in the context of natural disasters are likely subject to a large degree of risk and uncertainty. When confronted with choices involving uncertainty and risk, humans often rely on either intuitive thinking or the opinion of others (Safarzynska et al 2013). Secondly, the literature investigating the growth impacts of disasters often finds contradictory results (Cavallo et al 2013), suggesting the existence of multiple equilibria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%