2013
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Origin and Early Biogeography of Otophysan Fishes (Ostariophysi: Teleostei)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
101
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
9
101
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our phylogenetic reconstruction confirms the monophyly of Siluriformes and Gymnotiformes, but indicates that Characiformes are non-monophyletic and are divided into Characoidei and Citharinoidei, as seen in other molecular studies (Nakatani et al 2011;Chen et al 2013), and in contrast to morphological evidence (see summary in Chen et al 2013). Within Gymnotiformes, patterns of relationships largely match expectations based on taxonomy and prior phylogenetic studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our phylogenetic reconstruction confirms the monophyly of Siluriformes and Gymnotiformes, but indicates that Characiformes are non-monophyletic and are divided into Characoidei and Citharinoidei, as seen in other molecular studies (Nakatani et al 2011;Chen et al 2013), and in contrast to morphological evidence (see summary in Chen et al 2013). Within Gymnotiformes, patterns of relationships largely match expectations based on taxonomy and prior phylogenetic studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Placement of these families has varied across different studies [1, 4, 7, 69, 70] and here we obtain sister relationships between Acheilognathidae + Gobionidae and Tanichthyidae + Leuciscidae, with Xenocyprididae sister to all four of these families (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Despite having some characteristics of a redundant gene duplicate, this classification is usually attributed to genes resulting from relatively recent gene duplication events, with the vast majority of gene duplicates being silenced within a few million years (Lynch et al, 2001). However, unlike a more recent rhodopsin gene duplication, which may generate species-specific duplicates (Lim et al, 1997), our analyses suggest a much more ancient origin for the rh1-2 gene, within the rh1 gene family of a major group of bony fishes, which would place the duplication leading to the birth of rh1-2 somewhere between 153 and 248 million years ago (Nakatani et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2013). PAML analyses also suggest the potential for increased evolutionary rates at a variety of sites along the branch leading to the rh1-2 clade, followed by strong selective constraint characteristic of rh1 genes within the rh1-2 clade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%