2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5869-8_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Traits of Toxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this hypothesis provides a common thread running through diverse phenomena [168]. Interestingly enough, later work has confirmed that functionally relevant unfolded structures of many bacterial toxins are molten globules [221][222][223].…”
Section: Molten Globules and Intrinsic Disorder In Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, this hypothesis provides a common thread running through diverse phenomena [168]. Interestingly enough, later work has confirmed that functionally relevant unfolded structures of many bacterial toxins are molten globules [221][222][223].…”
Section: Molten Globules and Intrinsic Disorder In Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Analyzing their sequences and study of their function suggest that the ancestor of neurotoxins may not be in Clostridium genus, but rather may have been from viral polyproteins [124]. Alternatively, as highlighted by Kumar et al [125] that although there is very little similarity in the sequence outside the Clostridial Neurotoxin (CNT) family, it is possible to find an evolutionary correlation by establishing the relationship with similar structural and functional domains. Thus, two possibilities of BoNTs evolution are: BoNTs either evolved from a family of BoNT-like toxins, or BoNT genes may have spread to other organisms through HGT.…”
Section: Evolution Of Bacterial Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the substrates are not necessarily limited to SNARE proteins from vertebrate for clostridial neurotoxins. The co-evolution of substrate and toxins could play a role in the unique specificity of clostridial neurotoxins [125,133]. Chang and Singh [133] established the phenogram of different serotypes and their subtypes of clostridial neurotoxins, suggesting that BoNT/E is farthest (the least sequence convergence) from BoNT/C and /D (the most sequence convergence), while BoNT/A and TeNT is in between (Figure 3; [133] Further analysis of the substrates of BoNT/A, /C, and /E (SNAP-25 and syntaxin) revealed that the BoNT/E cleavage site has the highest sequence conservation, while the cleavage site of type C has the least conservation, inversely correlating with the phenetic tree of BoNTs [125,133].…”
Section: Evolution Of Bacterial Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations