2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary undersampling boosting for imbalanced classification of breast cancer malignancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-objective GP is also used to perform symbolic regression for imbalanced classification (Bhowan et al, 2013). Imbalanced classification is also addressed (Krawczyk et al, 2014) by learning cost-sensitive decision trees applying a GA or proposing evolutionary undersampling by the CHC application in order to obtain 1NN-based ensembles (Krawczyk et al, 2016).…”
Section: Classification (Second Period)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-objective GP is also used to perform symbolic regression for imbalanced classification (Bhowan et al, 2013). Imbalanced classification is also addressed (Krawczyk et al, 2014) by learning cost-sensitive decision trees applying a GA or proposing evolutionary undersampling by the CHC application in order to obtain 1NN-based ensembles (Krawczyk et al, 2016).…”
Section: Classification (Second Period)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire evaluation includes mammography (usually the primary step), thermography [45,46], Doppler imagery [47,48] and elasticity analysis [49]. Such evaluation along with the computerized cytology [50,51] constitutes a basic architecture toward the ultimate goal of fully automatic clinical decision support systems for detection and grading of the breast cancer [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, López et al [8] studied how six significant problems relating to the data intrinsic characteristics affected the performance of ensemble models for the IDL. Several superior ensemble models are based on boosting, such as EUSBoost [30], evolutionary undersampling boosting model in dealing with breast cancer malignancy classification [31]. Shi et al made use of bagging technique on SVM to cope with P300 detection problem [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%