Evolving local climate adaptation strategies: incorporating influences of socio–economic stress

Abstract

Socio-economic and climatic stresses affect local communities' vulnerability to flooding.Better incorporation of socio-economic stress in local vulnerability assessments is important when planning for climate adaptation. This is rarely done due to insufficient understanding of their interaction, in both theory and practice. The omission leads to critical weaknesses in local adaptation strategies. This study analyses how socioeconomic stress interacts with climatic stress and shape local vulnerability to flooding, and how such stress can be more efficiently managed within local government organisations. A framework containing potential stresses was developed and applied to investigate how socio-economic stress affected exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity in two case studies, using interview and group exercise transcripts. Cases consisted of major development projects in two Swedish municipalities, Gothenburg and Lilla Edet. The cases were similarly exposed to climatic stress but differed in socio-2 economic context, and previous professional climate change experience. Fierce foreign competition and market structure were seen as the two most significant socio-economic stresses influencing local vulnerability to flooding through shaping the 'local' worldview. In falling order sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity were seen to be influenced by the socio-economic stresses. Two approaches to efficiently incorporate climatic and socio-economic stress in local management are proposed: shifting the focus of vulnerability assessments towards future sensitivity of people and settlements, rather than on the current infrastructure's sensitivity, would facilitate their use in planning and by 'mainstreaming' adaptation into long-term strategic planning vulnerability would be more dynamically addressed and periodically revised.

Identifying drivers of household coping strategies to multiple climatic hazards in Western Uganda: implications for adapting to future climate change

“…Research into coping with multiple stresses has challenged perceptions about those most vulnerable to environmental stress, showing the need to consider those directly and indirectly affected (Hjerpe and Glaas 2011;Quinn et al 2011). If focuses on the socio-economic factors identified in this review as important for coping, such as livelihood activity and wealth, and how these factors shape the response to different hazards.…”

Planning for Climatic Extremes and Variability: A Review of Swedish Municipalities’ Adaptation Responses

“…The first step was to assess current adaptation approaches using a meta-evaluation of existing single and cross-case studies published between 2008 and 2013 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. These studies were identified through searching databases of scientific articles using the following search string: adaptation AND (Sweden OR Swedish) AND (urban OR city OR cities OR municipa*).…”

“…Others take out insurance to be prepared for liability claims from disaster-affected citizens [24] (this measure is, however, a grey zone and could alternatively be classified as internal mainstreaming). Table 1 Apart from the proactive strategies identified to push forward the integration of adaptation at institutional level and thereby assure adaptive and disaster-resilient developments on the ground, a range of opposite strategies was also found (Table 4).…”

“…It originates from Gothenburg, where each municipal department has mapped out how its own technical system could be impacted by flooding in the future (Table 5). This assessment was motivated by their (physical) location in a flood-prone area [24].…”

Vulnerability to multiple stressors in coastal communities: a study of the Andaman coast of Thailand

“…Coastal communities are particularly sensitive to the impacts of climate change, which has led to increasing storm events, storm surges, and erosion and impacts on infrastructure, saltwater intrusion into freshwater areas, impacts on ecosystems and species that are important for livelihoods, and changes in seasons and rainfall patterns leading to less predictability (see McClanahan & Cinner, 2011). Explicit recognition of multiple stressors and socio-economic stress is essential for successful adaptation planning and policy (Hjerpe & Glaas, 2012). The theory of "double exposure" recognizes that there are multiple stressors that are simultaneously impacting individuals, communities, groups, or sectors and interacting to produce both positive and negative outcomes (Leichenko & O'Brien, 2008;O'Brien & Leichenko, 2000).…”