2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving solar wind flow properties of magnetic inversions observed by Helios

Abstract: In its first encounter at solar distances as close as r = 0.16 au, Parker Solar Probe observed numerous local reversals, or inversions, in the heliospheric magnetic field (HMF), which were accompanied by large spikes in solar wind speed. Both solar and in situ mechanisms have been suggested to explain the existence of HMF inversions in general. Previous work using Helios 1, covering 0.3–1 au, observed inverted HMF to become more common with increasing r, suggesting that some heliospheric driving process create… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly there is what Lockwood, Owens, and Rouillard (2009b) termed "folded flux" and Owens, Crooker, and Lockwood (2013) termed "inverted flux" and which since the advent of Parker Probe observations is often called "switchbacks" (Bale et al, 2019;Jagarlamudi et al, 2023) in which the flux tube is bent back towards the Sun through of order 180 • . Before the Parker Solar Probe mission such structures were seen in data from several spacecraft, such as ISEE3 (Kahler, Crooker, and Gosling, 1996), Ulysses (Neugebauer et al, 1995;Balogh et al, 1999), ACE and Wind (Borovsky, 2016) and Helios (Horbury, Matteini, and Stansby, 2018;Macneil et al, 2020Macneil et al, , 2021. Using data from the Helios spacecraft, Macneil et al (2020) showed that switchbacks were absent in the innermost heliosphere and increased in occurrence with increasing heliocentric distance and so were generated in the heliosphere.…”
Section: Open Solar Fluxmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Secondly there is what Lockwood, Owens, and Rouillard (2009b) termed "folded flux" and Owens, Crooker, and Lockwood (2013) termed "inverted flux" and which since the advent of Parker Probe observations is often called "switchbacks" (Bale et al, 2019;Jagarlamudi et al, 2023) in which the flux tube is bent back towards the Sun through of order 180 • . Before the Parker Solar Probe mission such structures were seen in data from several spacecraft, such as ISEE3 (Kahler, Crooker, and Gosling, 1996), Ulysses (Neugebauer et al, 1995;Balogh et al, 1999), ACE and Wind (Borovsky, 2016) and Helios (Horbury, Matteini, and Stansby, 2018;Macneil et al, 2020Macneil et al, , 2021. Using data from the Helios spacecraft, Macneil et al (2020) showed that switchbacks were absent in the innermost heliosphere and increased in occurrence with increasing heliocentric distance and so were generated in the heliosphere.…”
Section: Open Solar Fluxmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The distribution of detected deflection angles resembles a power-law without specific populations present (Dudok de Wit et al 2020). There is preliminary evidence that switchbacks become more common with increasing distance from the Sun (Macneil et al 2021). Nevertheless, the formation mechanism(s) of switchbacks, and whether they originate in the lower solar atmosphere or locally in the solar wind are intensively debated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%