1981
DOI: 10.1177/144078338101700308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex-nuptially Conceived Births: a Note on Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Willis was born in New Zealand but arrived in Australia in the late 1970s to pursue doctoral studies. This sociologist produced a significant treatise on the division of labour in medicine (Willis 1983), and subsequently followed an almost exclusive interest in the health sector (Willis 1979(Willis , 1988(Willis , 1994(Willis , 1998Daly et al 1987Daly et al , 1992 The publications of the 1980s reflect a continuing concern with fertility, contraception, and reproduction (Callan 1980;Montague 1980;Mugford and Lally 1980;Betts 1980Betts , 1981Caldwell 1984;Neuendorff 1986;de Lepervanche 1989;Klein 1989). They also indicate an intensification of interest in medicalisation, professionalisation, and medical dominance (Gibson and Boreham 1981;Gibson 1985;Wilson and Gorring 1985;Turner 1986b), in capitalism (Braithwaite 1984), social movements (Osborne 1984), and inequalities such as disabilities (Rubinstein 1982;Rees and Emerson 1983;Sutton and Beran 1983).…”
Section: The 1980smentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Willis was born in New Zealand but arrived in Australia in the late 1970s to pursue doctoral studies. This sociologist produced a significant treatise on the division of labour in medicine (Willis 1983), and subsequently followed an almost exclusive interest in the health sector (Willis 1979(Willis , 1988(Willis , 1994(Willis , 1998Daly et al 1987Daly et al , 1992 The publications of the 1980s reflect a continuing concern with fertility, contraception, and reproduction (Callan 1980;Montague 1980;Mugford and Lally 1980;Betts 1980Betts , 1981Caldwell 1984;Neuendorff 1986;de Lepervanche 1989;Klein 1989). They also indicate an intensification of interest in medicalisation, professionalisation, and medical dominance (Gibson and Boreham 1981;Gibson 1985;Wilson and Gorring 1985;Turner 1986b), in capitalism (Braithwaite 1984), social movements (Osborne 1984), and inequalities such as disabilities (Rubinstein 1982;Rees and Emerson 1983;Sutton and Beran 1983).…”
Section: The 1980smentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Weberian, Durkheimian, interactionist and constructionist perspectives were still in evidence (Willis 1983(Willis , 1988George 1984;Hopkins 1989). Empirical papers were generally quantitative (Betts 1981;Najman et al 1983;Ryan and Dent 1984;Neil and Jones 1988;Minichiello 1989), but there was considerable excitement in the sociological community over the development of Lyn and Tom Richards' (1981) new software for the analysis of qualitative data; and Yolande Wadsworth's (1984) manual for qualitative evaluation research. For the first time, there was a sufficiency of Australian materials for research and textbooks for teaching the sociology of health and medicine.…”
Section: The 1980smentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Others have recognized the need for an index which treats all births resulting from non-marital intercourse in relation to a single population at risk, and which can be partitioned according to their eventual marital status. Betts' (1981) suggestion is unsatisfactory (Carmichael, 1982b(Carmichael, , 1984b. Earlier Ruzicka (1975) developed a method for estimating, at a census, the prevalence of non-marital pregnancy leading to marital and non-marital confinement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ON THE MEASUREMENT OF FERTILITY ASSOCIATED WITH EX-NUPTIAL CONCEPTIONS: A RESPONSE TO BETTS In a recent issue of the ANZJS Betts (1981) discussed the measurement of trends and differentials in ex-nuptially conceived births. In her paper she begins by noting, as many previous writers have, that neither the numbers of ex-nuptial and premaritally conceived nuptial births nor the proportions these represent of all births are particularly useful indices Indeed they may be positively misleading.…”
Section: Responses and Rejoindersmentioning
confidence: 99%