1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.2.1048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Calculation of the Penetrability Through Two-Peaked Fission Barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this circumstances, it is necessary to use a phenomenological barrier. A phenomenological barrier is conventionally simulated as a function of a dimensionless parameter β, that characterizes a deformation, within three smoothed joined parabolas [28]. In our work, an imaginary component of the potential is added between the turning points of the second well, in order to simulate the damping due to gamma and neutron emission.…”
Section: Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this circumstances, it is necessary to use a phenomenological barrier. A phenomenological barrier is conventionally simulated as a function of a dimensionless parameter β, that characterizes a deformation, within three smoothed joined parabolas [28]. In our work, an imaginary component of the potential is added between the turning points of the second well, in order to simulate the damping due to gamma and neutron emission.…”
Section: Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the isomer shelf cannot be due to an isomer in the 2nd minimum as recently suggested [15]. Here the single and double barrier penetrabilities were calculated with the relations proposed by Hill and Wheeler [16], and Cramer and Nix [17] respectively. If now we suppose that the isomer shelf is due to an isomer in the 3rd minimum, then with (1) and (2) and the barrier parameters given above, we can again reproduce reasonably the experimental isomeric shelf, with E~h ~ 4.6 MeV and the cross section value which is ~1~ compared to that for 23sU, for R~IO -s.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6] numerically by the Adams Moulton predictor-corrector method. The trajectories are computed as time goes on, keeping track of all three particles (the third one is easily done from conservation of momentum), and checking after a long time for the percentage of change in the ct-particle velocity.…”
Section: Dynamics Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%