2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-020-01511-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Constructions in the (Non-linear) Planar Theory of Elasticity: From Elastic Crystals to Nematic Elastomers

Abstract: In this article we deduce necessary and sufficient conditions for the presence of "Conti-type", highly symmetric, exactly-stress free constructions in the geometrically non-linear, planar n-well problem, generalising results of [CKZ17]. Passing to the limit n → ∞, this allows us to treat solid crystals and nematic elastomer differential inclusions simultaneously. In particular, we recover and generalise (non-linear) planar tripole star type deformations which were experimentally observed in [MA80a, MA80b, KK91… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, transition-state theory explains that the transformation from austenite to martensite is strongly influenced by the energetics of the critical nucleus, which is a small inclusion of martensite in an austenitic matrix. It is known that stress-free inclusions with interfaces of finite total area (or length, in two dimensions) are possible only for special material parameters [33,37,38,39,49,48,27,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, transition-state theory explains that the transformation from austenite to martensite is strongly influenced by the energetics of the critical nucleus, which is a small inclusion of martensite in an austenitic matrix. It is known that stress-free inclusions with interfaces of finite total area (or length, in two dimensions) are possible only for special material parameters [33,37,38,39,49,48,27,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is attained on the line [c, d] and is solved by t * := t − r c−d |c−d| for some r with 0 < r < C 1 2 . Here, the error bound for r is a consequence of (15). Using v(t) as a competitor and inserting the bound for r c,t implies…”
Section: Proposition 31 (Lower Bound On Elastic Energy)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also refer to [4,5,50] for the study of quasiconvexity at the boundary. Further, highly symmetric, low energy nucleation mechanisms have been explored in [25] and [15] both in the geometrically linear and nonlinear theories in two dimensions. In the geometrically nonlinear settings substantially less is known in terms of nucleation properties due to the presence of the nonlinear gauge group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [69] for the classification of over forty types of disclinations that can be constructed in MgCd alloys undergoing the hexagonal-to-orthorhombic transformation. Among them, we recall examples of beautiful, self-similar, martensitic microstructures containing a dipole of wedge disclinations (see in particular [74] and [75]), for which models and computations are produced in [85,23] and mathematical theories are derived in [21]. Examples of complex self-similar microstructures incorporating disclinations emerging from the nucleation and evolution of needle-shaped regions occupied by martensitic phase are described in [65,66] (see also [12,22] for computations and stochastic models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%