2007
DOI: 10.1155/2007/10693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Interior Reconstruction with Cone‐Beam CT

Abstract: Using the backprojection filtration (BPF) and filtered backprojection (FBP) approaches, respectively, we prove that with cone-beam CT the interior problem can be exactly solved by analytic continuation. The prior knowledge we assume is that a volume of interest (VOI) in an object to be reconstructed is known in a subregion of the VOI. Our derivations are based on the so-called generalized PI-segment (chord). The available projection onto convex set (POCS) algorithm and singular value decomposition (SVD) method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corresponding algorithms were suggested by Noo et al [6] and Pan et al [7] and are based on the concept of differentiated backprojection (DBP): After backprojecting the derivative of the projection data, these methods require a 1-D finite Hilbert inversion along specific lines in the backprojection result. Later, Defrise et al [8], Ye et al [9], [10], and Kudo et al [11] suggested an extension to the DBP method that solves the Hilbert inversion by iterative projection onto convex sets (POCS). This extension allows a wider class of truncation configurations to be solved accurately, but at the cost of higher computational efforts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding algorithms were suggested by Noo et al [6] and Pan et al [7] and are based on the concept of differentiated backprojection (DBP): After backprojecting the derivative of the projection data, these methods require a 1-D finite Hilbert inversion along specific lines in the backprojection result. Later, Defrise et al [8], Ye et al [9], [10], and Kudo et al [11] suggested an extension to the DBP method that solves the Hilbert inversion by iterative projection onto convex sets (POCS). This extension allows a wider class of truncation configurations to be solved accurately, but at the cost of higher computational efforts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for local CT image reconstruction [5][6], single photon emission tomography [7]- [10], and fluorescent x-ray computed tomography [11]. Moreover, these problems tend to be ill-conditioned and, if the data includes noise, the solution includes large oscillation due to the illconditioned problem and regularization may be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches in Noo et al [1], Pan et al [2], Defrise et al [3], Ye et. al [4], [5], Kudo et al [6], Chityala et al [7], Koloditz et al [8], [9] can provide exact or high accurate reconstruction for imaging. But they require either prior information of the object, or additional radiation dose, scans of patient shape and outline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%