2012
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.21653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Results on the Number of Restricted Edge Colorings for Some Families of Linear Hypergraphs

Abstract: For k‐uniform hypergraphs F and H and an integer r≥2, let cr,F(H) denote the number of r‐colorings of the set of hyperedges of H with no monochromatic copy of F and let cr,F(n)=trueprefixmaxH∈scriptHncr,F(H), where the maximum is taken over the family Hn of all k‐uniform hypergraphs on n vertices. Moreover, let ex (n,F) be the usual extremal function, i.e., the maximum number of hyperedges of an n‐vertex k‐uniform hypergraph which contains no copy of F. Here, we consider the question for determining cr,F(n) f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Theorem 1.2, for k ∈ {2, 3}, we have H n,r,c(k,ℓ) = H n,r,ℓ−1 , while H n,r,c(k,ℓ) ̸ = H n,r,ℓ−1 for k ≥ 4, so that the lower bound in (2) is tight if and only if k ∈ {2, 3}. This phenomenon replicates, for forbidden r-matchings I ℓ and k ∈ {2, 3}, what has been observed in other classes of forbidden graphs (such as complete graphs [1,15], odd cycles [1] and some bipartite graphs [9]) and special classes of forbidden hypergraphs [11][12][13]. More generally, Lemma 2.1 in [1] for graphs and the work in [13] for arbitrary r-uniform hypergraphs implies that, given an r-uniform hypergraph F and k ∈ {2, 3}, we have c k,F ,r (n) ≤ k ex(n,F )+o(n r ) .…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By Theorem 1.2, for k ∈ {2, 3}, we have H n,r,c(k,ℓ) = H n,r,ℓ−1 , while H n,r,c(k,ℓ) ̸ = H n,r,ℓ−1 for k ≥ 4, so that the lower bound in (2) is tight if and only if k ∈ {2, 3}. This phenomenon replicates, for forbidden r-matchings I ℓ and k ∈ {2, 3}, what has been observed in other classes of forbidden graphs (such as complete graphs [1,15], odd cycles [1] and some bipartite graphs [9]) and special classes of forbidden hypergraphs [11][12][13]. More generally, Lemma 2.1 in [1] for graphs and the work in [13] for arbitrary r-uniform hypergraphs implies that, given an r-uniform hypergraph F and k ∈ {2, 3}, we have c k,F ,r (n) ≤ k ex(n,F )+o(n r ) .…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Let k ≥ 4 such that (ℓ − 1)k ≡ 1 (mod 3) and fix n 0 as in Eq. (11). Up to isomorphism, the maximum of c k,ℓ,r (H) over all r-uniform hypergraphs H with vertex set of size n ≥ n 0 and minimum vertex cover of size either c(k, ℓ) − 1 or c(k, ℓ) is achieved by H n,r,c(k,ℓ)−1 or H n,r,c(k,ℓ) .…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible approach to our problem is to use Green's regularity lemma for abelian groups [8]. In various analogous contexts regularity lemmas have proven to be a suitable tool [1,14,12,13,11]. While this may work well here for groups with many subgroups such as F n p the technical difficulties are considerable for those lacking subgroups.…”
Section: Outline Of the Proofs And Stability Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related results. Problems analogous to the ones considered in this paper were investigated for many other discrete structures (see, e.g., [20,1,14,12,13,11,10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%