2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-017-9921-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact solution for a two-phase Stefan problem with power-type latent heat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the right hand side of equation (3.16) is an increasing function that increases from 0 to +∞, we can assure that (3.16) has a unique positive solution. We remark here that the solution of the problem (3.2)-(3.8) was obtained in [23] by using results for a heat flux condition from an argument not so clear for us, and for this reason we have proved it with details.…”
Section: Case When α Is a Non-negative Integermentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the right hand side of equation (3.16) is an increasing function that increases from 0 to +∞, we can assure that (3.16) has a unique positive solution. We remark here that the solution of the problem (3.2)-(3.8) was obtained in [23] by using results for a heat flux condition from an argument not so clear for us, and for this reason we have proved it with details.…”
Section: Case When α Is a Non-negative Integermentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The main contribution of this paper is to generalize the work that has been done in [18], [25] and [3], by obtaining the explicit solution of a one-dimensional two-phase Stefan problem for a semiinfinite material where a variable latent heat and a convective boundary condition at the fixed face is considered; as well as to obtain the results given in [23] when the coefficient that characterizes the convective boundary condition goes to infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that a typical time-dependence of the function Γ(t, x, y) is power-law. In particular, the time-dependence Γ = x − t 1/2 was established by J. Stefan in the 1D space case for the ice melting problem mentioned above, and such dependence occurs in many other situations (see, e.g., the recent papers [24,25,27,28,35,36]). Another typical profile is Γ = x−vt (v is an unknown velocity of the moving boundary), which occurs, for example, in the model describing the metal melting and evaporation under power energy fluxes [37].…”
Section: The Model and Its Lie Symmetriesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, the structure of such boundaries may depend on invariant variable(s) and this gives a possibility to reduce the given BVP to that of lover dimensionality. This is the reason why different authors applied the Lie symmetry method for solving BVPs with free boundaries [8,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. It should be stressed that a majority of these papers are devoted to solving of two-dimensional problems while only a few of them are dealing with multidimensional BVPs [21,23,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], it was developed a mathematical model for the shoreline movement in a sedimentary basin using an analogy with the one-phase melting Stefan problem with a variable latent heat. Besides, in [8], it was introduced a two-phase Stefan problem with a general type of space-dependent latent heat from the background of the artificial ground-freezing technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%