2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jofri.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact volumetric determination of fluid in the paranasal sinuses after drowning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overlooks the possibility that drowning victims may experience a greater influx of fluid compared to non-drowning victims and that fluid composition may differ. Analysis of fluid density has been conducted in the literature, but reference values remain unknown due to significant variation between studies [ 37 , 43 , 44 ]. In the present study, fluid volume was measured in mm 3 and expressed as ml, suggested to be more meaningful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overlooks the possibility that drowning victims may experience a greater influx of fluid compared to non-drowning victims and that fluid composition may differ. Analysis of fluid density has been conducted in the literature, but reference values remain unknown due to significant variation between studies [ 37 , 43 , 44 ]. In the present study, fluid volume was measured in mm 3 and expressed as ml, suggested to be more meaningful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circumstantial evidence is considered crucial in such cases, because the autopsy findings classically associated with drowning often lack sensitivity and/or specificity. Findings such as marked amounts of frothy fluid in the airways, increased lung weight, water in the stomach, hemorrhage of mastoid air cells in the middle ear, increased fluid volume in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses (“Svechnikov’s sign”), diatoms in the vasculature, hemolytic staining of the aortic intima (especially in freshwater drownings), and decreased splenic weight have each been associated with drowning but are poorly reproducible and may only prove that the body was submerged in water (in some cases postmortem) (4 8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%