2021
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9101147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of Computational Performance and Potential Applications of a Global Numerical Weather Prediction Model MPAS Using KISTI Supercomputer NURION

Abstract: To predict extreme weather events, we conducted high-resolution global atmosphere modeling and simulation using high-performance computing. Using a new-generation global weather/climate prediction model called MPAS (Model for Prediction Across Scales) with variable resolution, we tested strong scalability on the KISTI (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) supercomputer NURION. In addition to assessing computational performance, we simulated three typhoons that occurred in 2019 to analyze the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, initialization, mostly reading initial data, also resulted in more than a 10% standard deviation, indicating that the amount of time it took fluctuated. Kang et al [24] has already mentioned the issue of communication among input/output Lastly, Table 4 shows that the variable resolution that we tested required about 3.2 times more computational cost when concerning only time integration. The use of variable resolution also required almost double the initialization time, mostly for reading input data.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Horizontal Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, initialization, mostly reading initial data, also resulted in more than a 10% standard deviation, indicating that the amount of time it took fluctuated. Kang et al [24] has already mentioned the issue of communication among input/output Lastly, Table 4 shows that the variable resolution that we tested required about 3.2 times more computational cost when concerning only time integration. The use of variable resolution also required almost double the initialization time, mostly for reading input data.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Horizontal Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Besides, initialization, mostly reading initial data, also resulted in more than a 10% standard deviation, indicating that the amount of time it took fluctuated. Kang et al [24] has already mentioned the issue of communication among input/output cores within NURION. Considering the improvement in terms of forecast accuracy that users can expect with variable resolution, they must understand the amount of computational cost it will take.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Horizontal Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation