2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of the ecohydrological separation hypothesis in a humid subtropical area: Comparison of three methods

Abstract: The ecohydrological separation between soil water sources for plant water uptake and groundwater recharge has been recently examined in various climate zones primarily based on isotopic composition of water. The existence of the ecohydrological separation has profound implications for mechanistic ecohydrological modeling and water resource management. However, it is still unclear when and where the ecohydrological separation occurs, especially in humid regions. In this study, high frequency sampling of precipi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this hypothesis remains largely untested in ecosystems and climatic regimes where there is little evidence that there is true separation from interflow and water held back by soil matric potential ( 45 ). In some instances, where it has been investigated, it was either undetectable ( 46 ) or seasonally variable ( 47 , 48 ). During the growing season of this study, there is a consistently low sampling frequency, as expected, which suggests that the lysimeter volumes we reported reflect changes in ET.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hypothesis remains largely untested in ecosystems and climatic regimes where there is little evidence that there is true separation from interflow and water held back by soil matric potential ( 45 ). In some instances, where it has been investigated, it was either undetectable ( 46 ) or seasonally variable ( 47 , 48 ). During the growing season of this study, there is a consistently low sampling frequency, as expected, which suggests that the lysimeter volumes we reported reflect changes in ET.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indistinctively of soil depth, extraction method, season or region, water extracted from soil samples exhibited a clear meteoric origin in line with rainfall isotope seasonality and with minimal enrichment. Remarkably, the coincidence of ground and soil water along the CR MWL ( Figure 10A), suggests no strong evaporative effect and that there is a single soil water pool, rather than two soil water pools as suggested by the ecohydrological separation hypothesis (mobile vs. immobile water) reported by other studies worldwide (e.g., Evaristo et al, 2015;Luo et al, 2019). These results are coincident with those from a recent article by Jiménez-Rodríguez et al 2019, who showed a lack of evaporation and coincidence with the LMWL of soil samples of a wet lowland forest of Costa Rica during the dry season.…”
Section: Groundwater and Surface Water Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The algorithms of uncertainty analysis for the two models can be found in the Supporting information. The first one, PIB‐A is illustrated in Equations and (3) (Luo et al, ). δnormali+1=δTh×βA+δi×()1βA βA=δnormali+1δiδThδi×100%, where β A is the estimated contribution of throughfall to root‐zone moisture at Time Step i. δ i + 1 is the root‐zone moisture isotopic composition, δ i is the antecedent root‐zone moisture isotopic composition, δ Th is the isotopic composition of rain‐replenishment part of root‐zone moisture between Time Steps i and i + 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%