2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40617-018-0210-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining a Web-Based Procedure for Assessing Preference for Videos

Abstract: A web-based program was developed to conduct brief multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessments for videos (e.g., movies, cartoons, music videos). The preference assessment program was used with two populations: young adults with developmental disabilities and school-age children with emotional and behavioral needs. Stimulus preference hierarchies were identified for all participants, indicating that a web-based preference assessment procedure is an efficient procedure for isolating highly pref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We replicated the results of Curiel et al () showing that a web‐based MSWO determined preference hierarchies for four individuals diagnosed with ASD. Following the web‐based MSWO, a web‐based reinforcer assessment procedure, with automated functions, was implemented to assess the absolute reinforcing effects of the LP and HP stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We replicated the results of Curiel et al () showing that a web‐based MSWO determined preference hierarchies for four individuals diagnosed with ASD. Following the web‐based MSWO, a web‐based reinforcer assessment procedure, with automated functions, was implemented to assess the absolute reinforcing effects of the LP and HP stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Behavior analysts have long taken advantage of emerging technology and benefitted from doing so (Cohen & Rozenblat, ). The present data, combined with those of prior investigations (Brodhead, Abel, et al, ; Brodhead et al, ; Brodhead, Al‐Dubayan, et al, ; Chebli & Lanovaz, ; Curiel et al, ; Snyder, Higbee, & Dayton, ; Whitehouse, Vollmer, & Colbert, ), demonstrate that technology‐based applications provide a viable means for conducting preference assessments for a variety of stimuli and for assessing the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli. When those stimuli are videos, rather than video depictions of objects that will be made available at a later time, the automated device could be used to deliver putative reinforcers during interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability to display and download the results may reduce the time needed to calculate and graph the results. This version of the program was derived from the web-based MSWO assessment (Curiel et al, 2018), and, as with any tool or procedure, it remains to be assessed systematically. Future research may consider doing so with clients who show an interest in video and/or auditory content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulus preference assessments, in general, are procedures that aid practitioners and researchers in the identification of preferred stimuli (Hagopian, Long, & Rush, 2004), and they too have undergone modifications with technological advances and web‐based platforms. For example, digital pictures and video‐based preference assessments have been implemented to assess tangibles (Brodhead, Al‐Dubayan, Mates, Abel, & Brouwers, 2016; Clark, Donaldson, & Kahng, 2015; Snyder, Higbee, & Dayton, 2012), social interactions (Davis, Hodges, Weston, Hogan, & Padilla‐Mainor, 2017; Huntington & Higbee, 2018; Kelly, Roscoe, Hanley, & Schlichenmeyer, 2014), activities (Brodhead, Abston, Mates, & Abel, 2017), and video preferences (Chebli & Lanovaz, 2016; Curiel, Curiel, Li, Deochand, & Poling, 2018; Curiel & Poling, 2019). For an updated literature review on stimulus preference assessments and alternative stimulus modalities, we direct readers to Heinicke, Carr, and Copsey (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%