2012
DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.1413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining charitable donation process in South India: role of gender

Abstract: With increasing financial clout, females are potentially poised as a greater source of charitable giving in the West. However, debate exists in the marketing literature about gender‐based differences in charitable donations. The purpose of this study is to research whether gender‐based segmentation is effective for charities in cultures in which high gender inequality exists. Hence, India, an emerging economy with high gender inequality, was chosen as the study setting. Following an extensive literature review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be expected a priori that personal values exert strong influence on an individual's actions, behavior and prioritization (Fall, 2000;Kahle et al, 2000), including behavior associated with charitable giving (Beatty et al, 1991;Bennett, 2003). Donating money likewise is also impacted by individual-level variables, and several studies that examine predictors of giving find that age, gender (Andreoni and Vesterlund, 2001;Ranganathan and Sen, 2012), (Mook et al, 2007), religiosity (Jackson et al, 1995), immigrant status (Handy and Greenspan, 2009), marital status and household income (Mesch et al, 2006) significantly impact levels of giving. Besides, public recognition, belonging to the receiving society and pleasing God are other benefits received after donation (Davies et al, 2010).…”
Section: Determinants Of Charitable-giving Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be expected a priori that personal values exert strong influence on an individual's actions, behavior and prioritization (Fall, 2000;Kahle et al, 2000), including behavior associated with charitable giving (Beatty et al, 1991;Bennett, 2003). Donating money likewise is also impacted by individual-level variables, and several studies that examine predictors of giving find that age, gender (Andreoni and Vesterlund, 2001;Ranganathan and Sen, 2012), (Mook et al, 2007), religiosity (Jackson et al, 1995), immigrant status (Handy and Greenspan, 2009), marital status and household income (Mesch et al, 2006) significantly impact levels of giving. Besides, public recognition, belonging to the receiving society and pleasing God are other benefits received after donation (Davies et al, 2010).…”
Section: Determinants Of Charitable-giving Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust has also been found to be one of the key factors that motivate people to donate to charity organizations (Iwaarden et al, 2009;Ranganathan and Sen, 2012). Sargeant and Lee (2004) indicated that increasing trust between charitable organizations and the public would positively affect their relationship in the short and long terms.…”
Section: Determinants Of Charitable-giving Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of this fact, there are still a scarce number of studies focusing on the creation of a complete model in understanding the behaviour displayed during monetary donation, especially when the donation is conducted through CO. Furthermore, a large portion of the past inquiries regarding the public's behaviour during monetary donation was directed to developed Western economies (Ranganathan & Sen, 2012). Besides, a very few number of the inquiries explored the role of CO in the behaviours displayed by individuals during monetary donation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant issues include the extent to which the gender differences in philanthropy exist in a national context (e.g., due to differences in property rights, the labor market structure, and corporate culture between countries). In studies in the United States, females are more likely than males to donate more, whereas in southern India and the Netherlands, males donate more than females (e.g., Ranganathan & Sen, 2012;Wit & Bekkers, 2016). Jia and Zhang (2013) collect data on the philanthropic responses of privately owned Chinese firms to the Wenchuan and Yushu earthquakes on May 12, 2008, andApril 14, 2010, respectively. They find that when at least three females serve on the board of directors, the companies' responses to natural disasters are significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%