2018
DOI: 10.18848/2325-1379/cgp/v12i02/15-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Eye-Fixations during Wayfinding in Unfamiliar Indoor Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that participants used the following elements as sources of information (ordered from highest to lowest based on frequency of use): signs, architectural features (i.e., view to outside and multilevel interior view from atrium), maps, interior elements (e.g., artwork, display boards, and information counters), logical clusters of functions, pairings of interior elements, structural elements, and furniture. In another study, Ghamari and Pati (2018) analyzed eye-fixation data obtained during wayfinding and found that signs, architectural features, maps, and interior artifacts most frequently attracted the attention of participants, in conformity with Pati et al (2015) study findings.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Other Environmental Factors and Logsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that participants used the following elements as sources of information (ordered from highest to lowest based on frequency of use): signs, architectural features (i.e., view to outside and multilevel interior view from atrium), maps, interior elements (e.g., artwork, display boards, and information counters), logical clusters of functions, pairings of interior elements, structural elements, and furniture. In another study, Ghamari and Pati (2018) analyzed eye-fixation data obtained during wayfinding and found that signs, architectural features, maps, and interior artifacts most frequently attracted the attention of participants, in conformity with Pati et al (2015) study findings.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Other Environmental Factors and Logsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Other environmental factorsinformation pick-up Pati et al, 2015;Ghamari and Pati, 2018 are supported by the results of Kirasic (2000), which suggest that older adults acquire less spatial knowledge (i.e., knowledge of landmarks, routes, distances, and directions). Studies also suggest that older adults are slower than younger adults in acquiring spatial knowledge (Kirasic, 1991) and in performing spatial tasks (Davis et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Spatial Memories and Agementioning
confidence: 80%
“…“Eye-tracking” and “virtual reality” also have been paid attention to in wayfinding in interior environments literature. Ghamari and Pati [ 73 ] investigated eye fixations during wayfinding in unfamiliar indoor environments and found that identifying informative signs and architectural features is the most influential visual environmental attribute of wayfinding. Livingstone-Lee et al [ 74 ] conducted an eye-tracking study to objectively investigate the selection of navigational strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signage is a core topic in the advanced period (2016–2021). It appears that studies are focusing more on the impact of visual environmental attributes in the field [ 53 , 73 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ]. In the developing period, there was a shift towards virtual reality, with novel topics such as “virtual reality” (18th), and “virtual environments” (16th) developing as leading research priorities [ 17 , 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation