2013
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2013.812910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Foundations of Qualitative Research: A Review of Social Work Dissertations, 2008–2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A paradigm is a set of laws, theories, methods, applications and a whole system of thinking that forms a scientific research tradition. It includes basic assumptions, questions to be answered and problems to be solved (Gringery, Barusch & Cambron 2013;McBurney 1994;Neuman 1997).…”
Section: Research Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paradigm is a set of laws, theories, methods, applications and a whole system of thinking that forms a scientific research tradition. It includes basic assumptions, questions to be answered and problems to be solved (Gringery, Barusch & Cambron 2013;McBurney 1994;Neuman 1997).…”
Section: Research Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings differed from an analysis of 75 randomly selected qualitative dissertations completed between 2008 and 2010 in U.S. schools (Gringeri et al, 2013). In that study, grounded theory was similarly used twice as often as phenomenology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two additional U.S.-based reviews have focused specifically on qualitative dissertations (Brun, 1997;Gringeri, Barusch, & Cambron, 2013). Collectively, these studies have used a variety of methods (e.g., surveys, database searches) and sampling procedures (e.g., random selection, convenience sampling) to describe substantive areas covered in doctoral dissertations, methods used in the dissertations, and the extent to which the research is practice/intervention based.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Member checking (Creswell, 2014) was used, where possible themes were given to one participant to review. Credibility in based on dense description (Creswell, 2014;Tracy, 2010), concrete detail, triangulation or crystallisation (Creswell, 2014;Loh, 2013;Tracy, 2010) and member reflections (Creswell, 2014;Gringeri et al, 2013). A dense description (Creswell, 2014) of research methodology and a literature control were undertaken.…”
Section: Trustworthinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data and tentative interpretations of the data were discussed with four participants. The data were audited (Creswell, 2014;Gringeri et al, 2013) by a co-coder, while expert supervision was provided by a registered social worker and registered educational psychologist during the data-analysis process.…”
Section: Trustworthinessmentioning
confidence: 99%