2008
DOI: 10.1177/0165551508092260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the dimensionality and measurement of user-perceived knowledge and information quality in the KMS context

Abstract: While several knowledge management systems' (KMS) success measures have been developed in previous studies, most of them focus on the measurement of knowledge use and performance of KMS. Little research has been conducted to develop specific instruments for measuring KMS success from the perspective of KMS knowledge production. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop an instrument for measuring userperceived knowledge and information quality (KIQ) of KMS from the side of knowledge production. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, the values of the metric for currency Q Curr. (, A) can be computed automatically by using formula (3) …”
Section: B Computation Of the Values Of The Metric Q Curr ( A) Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, the values of the metric for currency Q Curr. (, A) can be computed automatically by using formula (3) …”
Section: B Computation Of the Values Of The Metric Q Curr ( A) Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, T  [0; ] represents the shelf life of the attribute value, which is usually finite and unknown. 3 We then consider the shelf life to be a continuous random variable and assume that it is exponentially distributed. The exponential distribution is a typical probability distribution for lifetime, which has proven its usefulness in quality management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the existing measures related to user information satisfaction, e-learner satisfaction, and knowledge and information quality 550 INTR 24,5 (e.g. Baroudi and Orlikowski, 1988;Doll and Torkzadeh, 1988;Palvia, 1996;Piccoli et al, 2001;Wang, 2003;Shee and Wang, 2008;Wang and Wang, 2009) and on the differences in characteristics between traditional web-based learning and blog-based learning (e.g. automatic cross-linking, knowledge repositories, and knowledge maps), this study therefore proposed 31 items to represent various dimensions underlying the ELBS construct, and these were used to form the initial pool of items for the ELBS scale.…”
Section: Research Methodology 31 Generation Of Scale Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System content, personalization, learning community, and learner interface Wang and Wang (2009) Perceived knowledge and information quality Content quality, and context and linkage quality Chen (2010) User satisfaction with e-learning systems Information quality, and system quality Wang and Chiu (2011) User satisfaction with e-learning 2.0 systems Information quality, system quality, service quality, and communication quality Udo et al (2011) E-learning quality Web site content, assurance, empathy, responsiveness, and reliability Hassanzadeh et al (2012) User satisfaction with e-learning systems Technical system quality, content and information quality, and educational system quality Wang et al, 2007;Chen, 2010;Wang and Chiu, 2011;Hassanzadeh et al, 2012). However, these studies focussed mainly on the measures of e-learning systems success and on the relationships among system success measures, such as information quality, system quality, service quality, user satisfaction, and system use, rather than on the measure of e-learning satisfaction itself.…”
Section: E-learner Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in Information Systems have adopted consultation of experts before testing models, especially in order to build and validate the collection instrument (e.g., Wang & Wang, 2009). Additionally, the perception of managers concerning IT impacts at the levels of processes and firm has been found to present similar results to studies using objective metrics for assessment of IT performance (Tallon, 2013;Tallon & Kraemer, 2007).…”
Section: Data Collection and Informantsmentioning
confidence: 99%