2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-022-09321-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the effect of a genetic algorithm-enabled grouping method on collaborative performances, processes, and perceptions

Abstract: Group formation is a critical factor which influences collaborative processes and performances in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Automatic grouping has been widely used to generate groups with heterogeneous attributes and to maximize the diversity of students’ characteristics within a group. But there are two dominant challenges that automatic grouping methods need to address, namely the barriers of uneven group size problem, and the inaccessibility of student characteristics. This research … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research used social network analysis (SNA) and quantitative content analysis (QCA) to analyze those two types of engagement dimensions. On the social engagement dimension, this research used the group-level SNA metrics to reveal groups’ social engagement attributes, including density, average path length (APL), average degree, average closeness, average betweenness, global clustering coefficients (GCC), centralization, the inverse coefficient of variation (ICV) of interaction (refer to Table 2 in Li et al, 2022 ). We first made network data in the excel files to record students’ interaction with peers at the group level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research used social network analysis (SNA) and quantitative content analysis (QCA) to analyze those two types of engagement dimensions. On the social engagement dimension, this research used the group-level SNA metrics to reveal groups’ social engagement attributes, including density, average path length (APL), average degree, average closeness, average betweenness, global clustering coefficients (GCC), centralization, the inverse coefficient of variation (ICV) of interaction (refer to Table 2 in Li et al, 2022 ). We first made network data in the excel files to record students’ interaction with peers at the group level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lambić et al (2018) have designed a variable neighbourhood search algorithm to generate heterogeneous groups that takes into account the pretest scores, interpersonal dynamics, prosocial behaviours, and levels of openness of learners in higher education. In addition, Li et al (2022) have proposed a genetic algorithm‐based heterogeneous grouping approach that tries to maximize the diversity of learners' characteristics within a group in higher education. The current research primarily focuses on the heterogeneous grouping approach, leaving a gap in the literature regarding the effectiveness of homogeneous grouping methods for adult learners.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the nature of groups, heterogeneous grouping is the most widely used grouping type because it can better satisfy diverse learning scenarios, especially in cooperative education, as used by [4], [5], [6], [8], [12], [13], [14], [15], [18], [26], and [28] whereas [19] developed an algorithm to generate homogeneous groups. Some research has focused on intra-and inter-group relationships.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, it becomes necessary to use heuristic search methods to find a satisfactory solution with a considerably lower computational effort. A widely used heuristic method is the genetic algorithm (GA), which is used in [5], [11], [13], [15], [16], [19], [27], and [28]. The study [7] used simulated annealing (SA) to form student groups based on past academic records.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation